Mark Harris wrote:
If the draft included a way to add arbitrary binary metadata to the
Ogg Opus stream, or allowed an Ogg Opus file to contain attached
There are two possibilities:
1) A proposal for adding binary metadata breaks already-encoded files,
in which case I don't think we should do it, considering people have
been producing those files for over two years now under the expectation
that they would continue to work, or
2) A proposal for adding binary metadata does not break already-encoded
files, in which case we have exactly the future extension mechanism you
want (emphasis on "future").
Your Proposal 3 obviously qualifies. I believe Proposal 4 could be made
to work (some care is required around the Vorbis issue, and to not paint
ourselves into a corner later, but those are details).
-As an individual
_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
codec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
