A fast response because these are easy:
Ben Campbell wrote:
I think I see. The point is that you decode rate still does not match
the hardware rate, thus the resampling? OTOH, I now find myself confused
by "next highest supported rate above this". Does "this" refer to the
"hardware’s highest available sample rate"? So the decode rate is always
equal to or higher than the hardware playback rate?
Correct (except possibly if the hardware supports rates higher than 48
kHz, in which case step 4 might apply).
-10, last paragraph:
Updates, or extends? If the former, the draft needs an “Updates RFC
5334” field in the initial heading.
I didn't see a response to this one.
The response was:
Added the field.
Or, from the diff:
-<rfc ipr="trust200902" category="std" docName="draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-09">
+<rfc ipr="trust200902" category="std" docName="draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-09"
+ updates="5334">
_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
codec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
