Yes, unfortunately. Stephan
On 2/2/16, 14:51, "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterr...@xiph.org> wrote: >Stephan Wenger wrote: >> Take the text, minus RFC boilerplate and formatting, and publish it wherever >> and however you want, but not in a form that could be confused with an RFC. >> That’s a least my recollection of the spirit of the discussions we had when >> deliberating RFC 5377. At the time, my recollection of the consensus was >> that we specifically DID NOT want to give open source folks the option to >> take an RFC and “run with it”. Debian and its requirements were >> specifically mentioned then. > >Is it your opinion that the XML source for the latest draft (which >includes instructions to produce the boilerplate and formatting, but not >the actual boilerplate and formatting) would qualify as "not in a form >that could be confused with an RFC"? _______________________________________________ codec mailing list codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
