Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-12: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-oggopus/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- There has been considerable last call discussion about the inclusion of additional copyright licensing language by the authors. The authors have agreed to progress the draft without such language, as reflected in revision 12. If the authors choose to grant additional rights, they may do so independently. Please note, however, that the xml2rfc source in the data tracker contains additional copyright text in comments. It is my understanding that this text will be removed prior to approval for publication. There has also been last call discussion about the fact that this draft is intended to be a proposed standard, but it normatively depends on RFC 3533 (the Ogg container format) , which is informational. In my opinion, this is appropriate because the draft specifies the encapsulation of Opus, which is a proposed standard. (RFC 6716). _______________________________________________ codec mailing list codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
