On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:08:36PM +0100, Ralph Giles wrote: > On 2016-06-17 1:26 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > > The fix does not impact compatibility, because the improvement does > > not depend on the encoder doing anything special. I also do not see > > any case where an encoder could have effectively used the current > > broken behaviour to improve quality over the proposed change. > > I support adding this refinement to the update draft.
+1 _______________________________________________ codec mailing list codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
