On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 18:25 +0300, Jonathan Morton wrote: > I think that in most cases, a long RTT flow and a short RTT flow on > the same interface means that the long RTT flow isn't bottlenecked > here, and therefore won't ever build up a significant queue - and that > means you would want to track over the shorter interval. Is that a > reasonable assumption? >
This would be reasonable, but if we have a shorter interval, this means we could drop packets of the long RTT flow sooner than expected. Thats because the drop_next value is setup on the previous packet, and not based on the 'next packet' Re-evaluating drop_next at the right time would need more cpu cycles. _______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
