On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:54 -0400, Dave Taht wrote: > My point was that same program would be just as damaging against > pfifo_fast. > > > Or just think of SYN flood attack. > > For which other defenses exist.
If someone uses pfifo_fast, it needs no particular protection right now to be able to log in into his machine. Thats the point you absolutely missed. Its kind of incredible. If fq_codel could replace pfifo_fast as is, why do you think I did not submit the patch doing the change ???? _______________________________________________ Codel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
