> On 20 May, 2016, at 16:41, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 20 May 2016, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> 
>> Normal traffic does not include large numbers of fragmented packets (I would 
>> expect a mere handful from certain one-shot request-response protocols which 
>> can produce large responses), so it is better to shunt them to a single 
>> queue per host-pair.
> 
> I don't agree with this.
> 
> Normal traffic on a well setup network should not include large numbers of 
> fragmented packets. But I have seen too many networks that fragment almost 
> everything as a result of there being a hop that goes through one or more 
> tunneling layers that lower the effective MTU (and no, path mtu discovery 
> does not always work)

One case of which would be the misconfigured PPPoE link Sebastian mentioned.

But I don’t think this is as big a problem as you do.  Most latency-sensitive 
protocols (and critical TCP phases such as handshake and teardown) use sub-MTU 
sized packets, so are less likely to be fragmented, so will still benefit from 
flow isolation.

And under normal circumstances, most MTU-sized packets are associated with 
congestion-responsive protocols, which can tolerate being shunted into a single 
AQM-managed subqueue per host-pair.  Flow isolation also still occurs between 
traffic to different hosts.

 - Jonathan Morton

_______________________________________________
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel

Reply via email to