On Friday, September 1, 2017 at 2:14:34 PM UTC-7, Steve Hannah wrote: > > The actual static field name is added by javac, and the current version > (without adding _ENUM_) works with all of our tools, as far as I know. > Making the change you suggest would break everything. > > The question is, why is your local toolchain generating these static > fields with a different naming convention than our toolchain does? How was > the .class file in question produced? > > I use the \bin directory that would be used for debugging, without running the build.xml script. I guess that's an adequate explanation
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CodenameOne Discussions" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/codenameone-discussions. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/8dda5be5-2ba5-4f6c-8ff8-573c6303e1fb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
