>
> (javafx/swing) Both look awful on newer hardware
>

if they look so awful then why did you guys roll your own gui that looks
worse ?

This GUI builder works on iOS, Android and in the browser directly right
> now
>

Who in the world is using this GUI designer on iOS, android or a web
browser ? im guessing no one. there are no IDE's for these systems. they
are not development systems. Who was the moron that thought
coding a desktop tool in a GUI meant for mobile phones was a good idea ?

unlike Swing we can actually fix and refine everything, it just takes
> proper bug reports from developers rather than whining and grandstanding
> from people who should know better.
>

Swing is part of java and is open source is it not ? so just take your own
advice then and file bug reports or fork it and expand on it to fit your
needs.
Despite its age swing is infinitely superior to the sub par and buggy
system used by the GUI Designer. You should really re-write the whole thing
in swing or javafx so that it actually behaves as users expect. And doesn't
look like trash.

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:25 PM Shai Almog <[email protected]> wrote:

> IntelliJ/IDEA was written well over a decade ago when Swing was at its
> prime. I doubt they would have re-made that choice today. Swings been dead
> for years, bugs go unfixed and features just aren't added. JavaFX never got
> to live. It's useless. Both look awful on newer hardware and don't support
> newer OS features/capabilities such as UWP...
> The same goes to SWT which is also a dead end technology.
>
> Even Java itself is in peril and pretty bad condition due to the stupid
> JVM distribution policies that make JavaFX apps even harder/nearly
> impossible to distribute. This GUI builder works on iOS, Android and in the
> browser directly right now. Unfortunately when we started the work there
> were no desktop Codename One apps so some of the theme elements need
> refinement but unlike Swing we can actually fix and refine everything, it
> just takes proper bug reports from developers rather than whining and
> grandstanding from people who should know better.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "CodenameOne Discussions" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/codenameone-discussions/wms0fPRlUJ0/unsubscribe
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/f16a31a3-65d6-4fab-9ae6-bba9526ea44b%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/f16a31a3-65d6-4fab-9ae6-bba9526ea44b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CodenameOne Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/CAAi795HE-7_4njnMDS5SircH9%3DXgtzFuq_b%2BGT_pYCAoOZEj1Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to