If you don't keep a reference to the form then it gets GC'd and it's a good 
practice to keep memory low. Recreating a form is relatively cheap.

On Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 4:10:12 PM UTC+3 P5music wrote:

> I have things like this in code:
> FormSubClass formToCall=new FormSubClass(Form mainForm, AppData 
> appData,...)
>
> then showBack() is used when the back command is called in the new form.
> Does this impact on the references?
> I mean, a for is created every time. Is this bad practice?
> Thanks
>
> Il giorno giovedì 20 agosto 2020 alle 03:46:52 UTC+2 Shai Almog ha scritto:
>
>> Use normal references. If the app dies it dies. We don't do the weird 
>> "partial death" behavior of Android. 
>> You should try to respect stop() though and stop networking etc. in that 
>> case (with the special case of background processes).
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 at 12:13:48 PM UTC+3 P5music wrote:
>>
>>> I am passing references to the Containers and Forms that are called from 
>>> the main app class, for example the parentForm or global data.
>>> Said that the app is the singleton and only can die in certain cases (if 
>>> I am not wrong), I woud like to know whether I have to use WeakReference so 
>>> to avoid circular reference or I can just use normal references.
>>> I hope this makes sense.
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Il giorno lunedì 17 agosto 2020 alle 03:41:59 UTC+2 Shai Almog ha 
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>>> Only in the case the app dies.
>>>> 1. It's reused for device orientation. 
>>>> 2. You can put global data anywhere you want. I often just put settings 
>>>> in Preferences so they will remain between executions.
>>>> On Sunday, August 16, 2020 at 4:13:03 PM UTC+3 P5music wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 1-So the Codename app singleton is recreated just in what cases?
>>>>> I think device orientation at least, and then?
>>>>> 2-Where can I put some global data structure, in the main form I guess?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno sabato 15 agosto 2020 07:27:55 UTC+2, Shai Almog ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. Our activity works a bit as a singleton and simplified the 
>>>>>> horrendous Android app life cycle. 
>>>>>> As a side note a few years ago in Google IO Romain Guy asked audience 
>>>>>> members for a show of hands if they know the Activity lifecycle. Hands 
>>>>>> were 
>>>>>> raised and he responded (I'm paraphrasing) "liars, I've been on the 
>>>>>> Android 
>>>>>> team since before it launched and I don't understand the Activity 
>>>>>> lifecycle".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I created a relatively simple app lifecycle diagram for the Uber 
>>>>>> clone book. The first two chapters (which include the diagram) are a 
>>>>>> free 
>>>>>> PDF download from here: https://uber.cn1.co/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 5:36:06 PM UTC+3 P5music wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My Android app is simple but it handles rotation, start from an 
>>>>>>> intent (cold and warm) (old intent or new), start from home, and so on. 
>>>>>>> The 
>>>>>>> methods that are called are not always know, so sometimes more than a 
>>>>>>> single method are called. For example onSaveInstanceState and 
>>>>>>> onConfigurationChanged are not always independent.
>>>>>>> My app has to manage editing data in the detail view. For example it 
>>>>>>> tries to ask the user whether it has to save, before going back or 
>>>>>>> choosing 
>>>>>>> other records.
>>>>>>> In many case this has to be done silently because the app is just 
>>>>>>> undergoing some strange eevent or transformation.
>>>>>>> Furthermore the app singleton sometime is lost.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Codename apps seem to be simpler from this point of view, but I need 
>>>>>>> to know if there is some "singleton" class I can count on every time, 
>>>>>>> unless the app is destroyed.
>>>>>>> I see that there is not fragment and activity cycles so I think this 
>>>>>>> is easy.
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CodenameOne Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/e9e24889-b531-4b86-90ff-2dd7a0896b64n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to