AFAIK they all use a single browser engine and are as a result single 
threaded. If JS in another component is blocking (or a navigation listener) 
then there could be cascading effects.

On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 3:46:22 PM UTC+2 P5music wrote:

> That error was a one-time event, I think.
> In fact the Javascript code is executed, for examples commands like this:
> var div=document.createElement('DIV');div.innerText="TEXT 
> INJECTED";div.style.position="relative";div.id
> ="0";document.body.appendChild(div);
> but then the BC is stuck.
> Do you deem that another BC elsewhere in the application with other 
> Javascript injection could cause this? Have the BCs something in common 
> that can be cross-locked?
> Il giorno domenica 1 novembre 2020 alle 03:28:13 UTC+1 Shai Almog ha 
> scritto:
>
>> Yes that could be relevant.
>> Can you update the Codename One libraries via Codename One Settings and 
>> try to reproduce this? 
>> That line number is no longer applicable.
>>
>> On Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 4:10:38 PM UTC+2 P5music wrote:
>>
>>> I do not see Javascript errors in Chrome (previously, syntax errors 
>>> where shown and I fixed them, now there is nothing)
>>> But I see this error in log, could it be relevant?
>>> Exception in thread "Thread-154" java.lang.NullPointerException
>>> at 
>>> com.codename1.impl.javase.cef.ResourceHandler.getResponseHeaders(ResourceHandler.java:39)
>>> Il giorno sabato 31 ottobre 2020 alle 06:04:48 UTC+1 Shai Almog ha 
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>>> Have you tried the chrome JavaScript debugger to see where it's stuck? 
>>>> Just inject some event code to see where things are blocked and see if 
>>>> breakpoints are reached.
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 9:30:16 AM UTC+2 P5music wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I realized that the executeAndWait call came from myApp, but in 
>>>>> another BC that's in another container. 
>>>>> Now all calls are of the execute() type.
>>>>>
>>>>> I debugged and I see that the calls are completed and the app runs 
>>>>> again.
>>>>> So the BC is not blocked by the Javascript injection.
>>>>>
>>>>> I created a test case but I see that this blocking does happen only in 
>>>>> my app.
>>>>>
>>>>> What further debugging is possible, said that the execute() method 
>>>>> seems not to the cause?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno venerdì 30 ottobre 2020 alle 07:06:54 UTC+1 Shai Almog ha 
>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> executeAndWait uses invokeAndBlock to wait. That means that the 
>>>>>> JavaScript call never completed. 
>>>>>> Since this happens in the simulator it's pretty easy to place a 
>>>>>> breakpoint on executeAndWait to find out who invoked it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 11:03:17 AM UTC+2 P5music wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems that it is stuck repeating here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while (!res.complete) {
>>>>>>> Display.getInstance().invokeAndBlock(new Runnable() {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> public void run() {
>>>>>>> Util.wait(res, 1000);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> });
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in executeAndWait. 
>>>>>>> Notice that in my app this method is not called, instead the normal 
>>>>>>> execute() is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il giorno giovedì 29 ottobre 2020 alle 04:25:43 UTC+1 Shai Almog ha 
>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know. We'll need to see an issue in isolation in the issue 
>>>>>>>> tracker to debug this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 11:02:11 AM UTC+2 P5music wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No errors in JS console.
>>>>>>>>> Could it be possible that the execute() instruction is waiting for 
>>>>>>>>> some call like onSuccess() ?
>>>>>>>>> If I am not wrong, documentation says it is not the case but maybe 
>>>>>>>>> it is an issue of the method.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Il giorno mercoledì 28 ottobre 2020 alle 03:37:21 UTC+1 Shai Almog 
>>>>>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did you open this in the JavaScript debugger and looked at the JS 
>>>>>>>>>> console while doing that?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 at 12:15:15 PM UTC+2 P5music wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is not a regression, I created a test case with a similar 
>>>>>>>>>>> layout and it worked with a Google page.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I debugged my app and it turned up being Javascript injections' 
>>>>>>>>>>> fault.
>>>>>>>>>>> But it is very strange:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The initial page of the BC is made by:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> webView.setPage("<HTML><BODY 
>>>>>>>>>>> style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;\" >"+
>>>>>>>>>>>                createLines()+
>>>>>>>>>>>                       "</BODY></HTML>","");
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>> where it is
>>>>>>>>>>> private String createLines()
>>>>>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>>>>>         String result="";
>>>>>>>>>>>         for (int i=0;i<100;i++)
>>>>>>>>>>>             result=result+"<BR/><P>TEXT - LINE "+i+"</P>";
>>>>>>>>>>>         return result;
>>>>>>>>>>>     }                      
>>>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>> It is just to have a long page. At this stage the scrollbar and 
>>>>>>>>>>> the mouse wheel work, and the page is scrollable.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then a list of commands like 
>>>>>>>>>>> var 
>>>>>>>>>>> div=document.createElement('DIV');div.style.position="relative";
>>>>>>>>>>> div.id="1";document.body.appendChild(div);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> are injected, in a single string.
>>>>>>>>>>> As I can see the BC does not like that commands, even just one 
>>>>>>>>>>> of them (I tried just one of them too).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The divs are correctly displayed, also with real content inside 
>>>>>>>>>>> them, but the issue is present even with this bare empty div HTML.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When that command is injected the BC is no more responsive to 
>>>>>>>>>>> mouse events.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This method is used:
>>>>>>>>>>>  public void executeJS(String command)
>>>>>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>>>>>         webView.execute(command);
>>>>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>>> What's wrong with that Javascript injection?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Il giorno martedì 27 ottobre 2020 alle 03:55:28 UTC+1 Shai Almog 
>>>>>>>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case it could be a CEF regression. Can you isolate a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> runnable test case that reproduces the problem and file an issue?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 1:10:53 PM UTC+2 P5music wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot test on the FX version, I am testing the CEF one on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Simulator (no device test available too).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I see the vertical scrollbar of the BrowserComponent, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it stays also with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> setScrollVisible(false);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the BC does not scroll with that, and it does not scroll 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even using the mouse wheel, or dragging over with the mouse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Il giorno lunedì 26 ottobre 2020 alle 04:44:34 UTC+1 Shai 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Almog ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see a scroll bar on the browser component?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you try this on the device? Did you try it with the FX 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version of the browser component?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 25, 2020 at 12:28:46 PM UTC+2 P5music 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I removed all useless calls to  setScrollable kind of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methods.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is called just on the mainForm and/or its content pane.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainForm.setScrollable(false);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainForm.getContentPane().setScrollableY(false);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is needed to let not scroll the entire user interface.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But the BC is not scrollable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I set scrollableY=true for the left container it does not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scroll either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the BC or the left container has to be scrollable to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fulfill my needs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What further checks can be done?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Il giorno domenica 25 ottobre 2020 alle 03:14:39 UTC+1 Shai 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Almog ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't change the scrollability of the browser component.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That option is under zoom and it relates to the scrolling 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the simulator skin itself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't need to explicitly call setScrollable(false) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since that's the default. The only thing that's scrollable by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> default if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the content pane of the main form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, October 24, 2020 at 2:09:05 PM UTC+3 P5music 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The CEF BC is used. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the mainform: setScrollable(false)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the BC: setScrollableY(true)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no simulator menu entry "scrollable" to uncheck, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I do not understand why to uncheck it anyway, and what it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would refer 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please can you explain?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have nested containers and I set them all with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setScrollableX(false) and setScrollableY(false).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also the result container of fab binding is set the same. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (this result container is added to the form)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A thing has be noticed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The most deep nested level is a BorderLayout. It has in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the north a vertically-short container, then in the center it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BrowserComponent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When attempting to scroll the BC, just sometimes I see a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very tiny movement of the entire BC including the vertical 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scrollbar, but 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not the other container in north position.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This reminds me that something is scrolling that's 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surrounding the BC but I cannot understand what.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you see anything about this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Il giorno sabato 24 ottobre 2020 alle 07:32:54 UTC+2 Shai 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Almog ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is it set to scrollable?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you mean in the simulator menu try to uncheck 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scrollable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you using CEF or the FX based browser?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 5:41:50 PM UTC+3 P5music 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My CodenameApp has a main form that splits the screen 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like a master detail layout in landscape mode. It is set 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not scrollable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A table layout is used with some constraints to have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this appearance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am testint the app in the simulator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the left part a BrowserComponent is inside a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> container and displays some HTML code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that the vertical bar appears on the BC because 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the HTML overflows vertically, but cannot be moved, it is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The BC is not resposive to the mouse wheel too. It is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set scrollable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The container is bound to the FloatingActionButton that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is floating on the container itself and the BC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know any issue that prevents the BC from being 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scrolled? Is it something related to the Version 7.0 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> milestone issues?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CodenameOne Discussions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codenameone-discussions/4ca7e411-9a49-4deb-a43e-153508101ca5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to