At 05:18 PM 7/20/2001, you wrote: > > Well its a good idea (to make one that represents the commonailities of the > > big4 minus IRCnet of course). Is there a mailing list for this 'review' ? > >I'm not yet familiar enough with that section of the IETF to be able to >tell you. I imagine it would be the IESG's internal mailing list, though, >so likely not directly accessible to the likes of us. It makes no senese whatsoever to think about yet another RFC unless it contains a specification for client-server protocol negotiation. Otherwise you can keep on pumping out "official" documents... A/S