The idea here is to protect channels right? A good way to protect channels
are to also protect them from adding a wrong user name via a typo. If it's
easy to implement, why not do it? If it's too costly resource wise then
"we" can say "it's not our problem it's the channel manager's problem"
Isn't the goal here (Undernet and cservice) a better user experience?
stoney`
At 08:47 PM 9/10/01 +0800, you wrote:
>So just do a mass remuser. If you were legitimately added, we
>wouldn't do anything if you did.
>
>At 12:40 AM -0500 10/09/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>I Agree there,
>>
>>In the past I have had turkish channels adding me as 450 + in there
>>channels without my concent , and then when there is trouble there they
>>say "Well simba is 450 here" and I look quite foolish.
>>
>>Would be nice to have some acceptence like stoney said
>>
>>Simba
>
>
>--
> ___ | | ___ __ _| | ___ _ _ _ ___ ___ ._ _
> <_> || |/ ._>\ \/ / . |<_> || | | |<_-</ . \| ' |
> <___||_|\___./\_\ \___|<___||__/_/ /__/\___/|_|_|
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=- http://www.theducks.org/
> 4496760@ICQ
>
> "Some people thought I was a lame duck in '95,
> I'll just keep quacking. I've got another 10
> weeks to quack" -- Bill Clinton
Py Fivestones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
