I still think an added user should have to approve being finally added somehow - which would solve this problem. I nearly wrote essentially what you just did Greg but bit my tongue..
Can I re-request that the coder-com consider reccomending that a notice like -X- ReBELSucks has attempted to add you to #mydoghasfleas at level 499. If you approve of this /msg X approve #mydoghasfleas - if you do not, /msg x deny #mydoghasfleas . ? At 22:55 27/09/01 +0100, Greg Sikorski wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/09/2001 19:20:24: > > > Why not put a code in that sais if a user is suspended, he can not be >removed. > > > > I presume you know that if you have someone on the userlist that is >close to > > you, and is willig to "betrade" the other ops, he could /msg x remuser > > #channel username, and then /msg x adduser #channel username level, and >his > > suspension is cancelled. > > > > > >The downside of this is you can essentially "Lock" a person into being >added in a channel without their consent, just by suspending them - >they'll be unable to remove themselves from #!!!!!!!!!!hot-turtles. You >could make it so that self-remuser's still work, however you're left with >the same problem :) > >Greg
