I often refer to these documents as rogue rfc's because they are network specific and they do not make that clear, not very good cricket imho.
-=-peas-=- ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:37 AM Subject: [Coders] rfc's > > Heya, > > The new RFC's (2810-2813) have been submitted as "informational" rather > than "standards track". People often do this to disseminate information on > work done on a subject. I'd suggest that the same be done for IRCU. :-) > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/overview.html > > Mandar Mirashi > Maintainer: ftp.undernet.org, Undernet IRC FAQ. > ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/alt.irc.undernet > For IRC help/Undernet information, check out http://www.undernet.org > > >
