true.. i just tried it too [19:15:28] *** Now talking in #sdf /mode +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* [19:15:31] *** mick sets mode: -bbb *!~3test3@3test *!~2test2@2test *!~test@test [19:15:31] *** mick sets mode: +bbbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@*
ircu displays -bbb then +bbbb when you're only issuing +bbbb... u2.10.10.pl18.(release). Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org B120eEFfHIKMptUvW mick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ? > It appears that so far very few people have taken the time to understand > what it is Hidden is reporting. When I look at the log he sent along, I > see him issuing one set of four bans. The mode messages that get sent > out, however, are two sets, the first of 3 bans, all removed, and the > second of 4 bans, all added--and the order is incorrect. If you mentally > process the bans as he shows, you end up with 4 bans on the channel when > in fact there is only one--the last one in his sequence. (You also see > bans removed that weren't present in the first place.) > > What he has reported is in fact a bug--ircu should not behave in this > fashion. There's a slim chance that it is a bug in his client, but I > would place the probability of that being the case at about 5-10%--no > client I know of keeps track of the channel's ban list. > > My original question stands: What server version displays this behavior? > -- > Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
