In a log below, with pWr, he claims there is a bug in the new code .. I'm 
pasting his conversation below along with the info on a person who 
supposedly had utilized the bug.

Bob

khaki is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * khaki
*** Looking up microsoft.com
*** Resolved microsoft.com to 207.46.197.102

/userip khaki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[0:25] <pWr> i've used it, works nicely
[0:26] <pWr> not many people have it
[0:26] <pWr> like 4-5
[0:26] <pWr> just letting you guys know
 > care to say any more about where the bug is or how it is used?
[0:26] <pWr> sure
[0:27] <pWr> dns ID sequencing. Every DNS packet has a 'unique' ID, it's 
only an int and can hold 65536 possible values. er.. what it boils down to, 
is if you can predict the packet ID, and send a response packet back to the 
querying DNS server before the real DNS server answers(ie: it's being 
DoS'd), it doesn't know the differance.

Reply via email to