----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Maassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ideas
> Dave, ya right, but there is still an issue within the +x model undernet > will use, issue is a users hosts gets 'hidden' *AFTER* he successfully > authed with X, so that system is actually kinda useless in my opinion. > > Reason: > Problem is that users will still be 'nukable' since there IP does not get > hidden upon connect and joining channels thus still showing there TRUE ip. > > Solution: > Forced +x mode upon connect using a default hostmask (for example : > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) if a user doesn't want this feature then he can > still do a -x afterwards, then it's up to the user to take care of his > protection. > lol You forgot /quote who %i bug :) fake host or not, people can still see your IP :( > The other fact is that ircu sets the new host by emulating a quit/rejoin of > the user, thus showing quits all over the channels. Kinda irritating if you > got 70k users constantly reauthing etc. I think it will put a hell lot more > stress on the server handling then if you would handle the hostchange > internally, also imagine that clients also have event handlers, some of them > might return output after a join/quit, thus increasing the bandwidth usage > dramatically as well. Handling it internally like other ircd's already do > releases that pressure. > I'm working for my network for a solution to this. Chojin
