On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Kev wrote: > We could make the maximum number of bans in a banlist be proportional to > the number of users on the channel in question. Anyone have any immediate > reactions to this?
Other than rewarding large channels during peak times while penalizing them off-peak, when attacks seem to be more likely, and the interesting, amusing, and presumed behavior of bans just 'vanishing' as the channel deflates, not really. Any statistics on the average number of bans per-channel and network-wide, length of ban masks, volume of memory dedicated to storing them, etc.? I've a couple half-baked ideas for Better Ways ... --Liandrin
