> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 11:04:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hello: > > maybe is a server error or whatever is it , i've saw many users reporting the > > same ... after a few minutes i got the same problem. > > disconnected (from Amsterdam.NL.EU.undernet.org) Reason: Closing Link: > > NeoWatch by Amsterdam.NL.EU.undernet.org (dbuf_put fail) > > I was disconnected too with dbuf_put fail, yesterday (from Amsterdam.*) >
in 2.10.11 dbuf's are only used for input parsing, for output parsing we use msgq's. Amsterdam.* was using approximately 13k/14k dbuf's yesterday, it's currently using about 4k/14k. Amsterdam2.* is using 435 dbufs, and has only peaked at 900 odd in use (out of about 14k). This could be related to these two servers using different event engines (kqueue and /dev/poll) but other than that, why else would one server see these being drastically different? -- What an artist dies with me! -- Nero
