> > It is very, very important that the max users field be of the correct > > form. > > -- > > Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > indeed. i hope it'll be fixed? (127 looks very ok to me) > > i think of another idea: in ircu, check the numeric of the S message and > force it to be 2^n-1 (otherwise break the link), to prevent mistakes in > the future. i could make a patch for this. >
I'd rather force a squit with a protocol violation error, we shouldn't silently fix problems, but force them fixed where they occur. -- Being a mime means never having to say you're sorry.
