sorry dewd .. but i dont think this thread belongs to that list. I know you know regarding your subject but writing this should mean "not send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" imho.
regards, -- nighty passes b.... around ;) At 23:58 23/07/2002, you wrote: >A few minutes ago I received this statement through someone at coder-com: > >[23:37:34] <@notnet> i suppose thats what you should expect from someone >that us an uber eleet hacker that hangs in #warezhq >[23:37:43] <@notnet> us/is >[23:37:59] <r41n> lol >[23:38:09] * @notnet disappears > >Just for the info: The only reason why I reside in that channel is to make >sure that the sources used in that channel will NOT be used for floodings. >Furthermore there are plenty of opers on this network that hang around in >warez/hack/pron channels themselve, and noone bitches about them. R33D33R on >the other side hangs around with the coders of the LITMUS trojan on a couple >of networks and sometimes uses those bots to speed up registrations and >other stuff. Stop making assumptions wich are not verified. I am NOT a >hacker. All claims about reedeer from me are verified and you can easily ask >around the network for that. > >That coder-com supports someone that abuses the work of other ppl and >redistributes it as his own material (coz there is no way that a beginning >coder like reed is able to have coded these complex patches that have >recently been submitted by him) on his own, actually disappoints me, and I'm >not the only one with that opinion, I'd rather see users like Math_ being >supported and added to the X list then reed. > >Kind regards, >Alexander Maassen >a.k.a. OUTsider
