would it not be easier to have a single codebase and have each network #define out the features they don't require rather than everyone haveing to make a patch work against a radically changed codebase
secondly i have heard it mentioed that undernet are considering supporting ipv6
the big danger with ipv6 is that with almost every end-site being allocated a /48 regardless of size implementing a workable clone control policy will be virtually impossible
thirdly wy the hell does ircu 2.10.11 send a : before the last perameter of a join or part message this is a waste of bandwidth as well as breaking compatability with some clients
and for that matter why does it send crlf instead of just lf on server-server links this is also a waste of bandwidth and afaict no p10 implementation minds being sent just lf
plugwash
_________________________________________________________________ Stay in touch with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.co.uk
