On Tue, 4 May 2004, bas wrote: > "To do so, it uses numeric 345: > > <channel> :<user being invited> has been invited by <user issuing invite>" > > shouldnt it have been a more parseable syntax?
I agree.. this smells of the old 'is logged in as' debate.. Make it 345 <channel> <inviter> <invitee> :has been invited by ? GK
