I suppose it has to do with the following, wanted, behaviour: +b abc* --> server <-- +b ab*
If the abc* reaches the server first, then the +b ab* needs to send -b abc* +b ab* to the _clients_ (not the server(s) on the left, overlapping bans should be taken care of automatically). Thus, apparently .12 fails to see if a ban coming in from a server is already set exactly, in which case the whole ban should be dropped/ignored. On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:04:39AM +1200, Richard wrote: > As running on London2.uk.eu.undernet.org > > if 2 users set a ban, and 1 of them are on london2 at the time, we see 1 > set the ban, then the other remove and reset the ban (from london2) in > the same line. (it gets worse) > > if the user we see "resetting" the ban in this way is the one on london2 > while the ban remains set on london2, the reset of the network only sees > the ban removal (no reset) > > examples... > > xplora's log (london2 ircu 2.10.12.alpha.08) > 00:47:51: >Mode change "+b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by xplora > 00:48:06: >Mode change "-b+b [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on > #newzealand by xplora > 00:48:24: >Mode change "-b+b [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on > #newzealand by wakco > 00:49:25: >Mode change "-b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by wakco > 00:49:29: >Mode change "+b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by wakco > 00:49:37: >Mode change "-b+b [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on > #newzealand by xplora > > wakco's log (helsinki ircu 2.10.11.06) > 00:47:51: >Mode change "+b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by xplora > 00:48:07: >Mode change "-b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by xplora > 00:48:24: >Mode change "+b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by wakco > 00:49:24: >Mode change "-b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by wakco > 00:49:28: >Mode change "+b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by wakco > 00:49:36: >Mode change "-b [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on #newzealand by xplora > > I only noticed this because #CService's UCSCWatch was on london2 and it > would appear to start weird kick/ban runs against bans set by channel > ops and even X > > - xplora > > -- > CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. > If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, copy or retain > it. Please immediately notify us by return email and then delete the email. > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner with McAfee UVScan, and is believed to be clean. > > > _______________________________________________ > Coder-com mailing list > Coder-com@undernet.org > http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
