On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:16:52PM +0200, Progs wrote: > If I have two servers, AA and AB, with AAAAA and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel. > AAAAA is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
There is no such thing as being 'delayed'. In order to know where to send messages, the JOIN is propagated to all servers (and services) regardless of the +D. It's only that the clients don't get to see the JOIN (yet). So, what you mean is that AAAAA only joined so far and didn't do anything else yet. > There are only AAAAA and ABAAA in #foo. > When AAAAA speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, which is why +d must be propagated thus. > so ABAAA doesn't see AAAAA's join. Correct. > Bug or feature ?:) For a service like X/W (what +d was invented for) it makes no difference: the JOIN is always sent to the service and all servers. For a bot that wants to limit it's own bandwidth by using +d, it makes a difference if it's alone on a server or not I guess. +D is meant for VERY large happening/channels however... it seems impractical to assume that there is such a bot alone on a server in that case. I see no reason to worry about this. -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
