Title: Which REF are you!?


Within any specific loop you can distinguish one REF segment from another by the qualifier in REF01. For example, in loop 2010AA the REF segment for the BILLING PROVIDER SECONDARY IDENTIFICATION in REF01 you can have:
0B State License Number
1A Blue Cross Provider Number
1B Blue Shield Provider Number
1C Medicare Provider Number
1D Medicaid Provider Number
1G Provider UPIN Number
1H CHAMPUS Identification Number
1J Facility ID Number
B3 Preferred Provider Organization Number
BQ Health Maintenance Organization Code Number
EI Employer’s Identification Number
FH Clinic Number
G2 Provider Commercial Number
G5 Provider Site Number
LU Location Number
SY Social Security Number
U3 Unique Supplier Identification Number (USIN)
X5 State Industrial Accident Provider Number
 
Within the same loop 2010AA the REF segment for the CREDIT/DEBIT CARD BILLING INFORMATION in REF01 you can have:
06 System Number
8U Bank Assigned Security Identifier
EM Electronic Payment Reference Number
IJ Standard Industry Classification (SIC) Code
LU Location Number
RB Rate code number
ST Store Number
TT Terminal Code
 
Notice how these two lists are mutually exclusive.
 
Jonathan Hale
Health New England
-----Original Message-----
From: Dekker, Cory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:56 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Which REF are you!?



Hi all,

In the 837P (v4010X098), Loop ID 2010AA [BILLING PROVIDER NAME], there are 2 Situational REF Data Segments, with identical Data Elements; "BILLING PROVIDER SECONDARY IDENTIFICATION" and "CREDIT/DEBIT CARD BILLING INFORMATION".

Each REF segment can be repeated up to 8 times and both support the same REF Data Elements, including the REF01 ID codeset.  Like most situational codesets, the Internal HIPAA codeset values are distinct by Data Segment, except for ONE code value:  BOTH of them allow "LU" [Location Number].  Both are SITUATIONAL segments, such that it appears that it could be possible to encounter the latter, without the former, and by the data alone, not easily know which data segment you are looking at.

In reading and re-reading the IG, I have been unable to find a clue as to how to know in a grouping of 4 or 5 REF's in a row, where does SECONDARY INFO end, and BILLING INFO begin.  I also found no mention of this problem in either the Errata or the Addenda drafts.  Granted, as a Payer, we should never receive the second data segment.  However, in theory, our HIPAA compliance validator should be recognizing when it might occur, and reject any transaction which contains it.  [yes, I know, "he implied they might reject a claim!"... I'm still struggling with it myself...]

Am I missing something?  Am I reading things correctly?  Has anyone encountered this before?

Has anyone resolved this, and if so, how?

                                Thanks in advance for all assistance...
                                                -Cory

P.S.  Sorry for the cross-post, but I see this as both a transactional recognition issue, as well as an internal situational codeset issue.


To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=codeset
and enter your email address.

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.
To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=codeset
and enter your email address.

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.

Reply via email to