2017 Social Policy in Africa Conference
20-22 November 2017
University of South Africa, City of Tshwane, South Africa

Theme: Social Policy in Africa’s Development Context

The ‘counter-revolution’ in Development Economics that emerged in the 1980s 
brought in its wake a ‘counter-revolution’ in Social Policy. In its origin, the 
‘counter-revolution’ could be understood as a revolt against the normative 
underpinnings of the ‘welfare state’—something marked by Frederick von Hayek’s 
The road to serfdom (1944). By the 1980s in the North, this involved efforts at 
retrenching the state and restructuring welfare provision. In the South, and 
especially in the African context, this involved a comprehensive reconstitution 
of the way the state ‘thinks’ and acts in relation to the economy and its 
citizens. From the idea of a state that ‘thinks’ in terms of a comprehensive 
obligation for securing long-term national wellbeing and development, what 
emerged was a ‘night-watchman’ state, more recently recast in the language of 
the ‘capable state’—one more focused on securing the space for private 
investors than the wellbeing of its citizens. Economic policy was increasingly 
disconnected from social policy, with a public policy orientation that is 
averse to socialised provisioning, solidaristic risk pooling, (inter-class) 
redistribution, and universalism. Social policy became largely residual.

Social policy has always been shaped by two broad contending forces. On the one 
hand, we have those who see its objectives as mopping up the diswelfares that 
emerge from market and institutional failure. On the other hand, are those who 
see social policy as having an encompassing reach and coverage, integrated with 
economic policy, and driven by norms of equality and solidarity. The former 
takes a residual approach, with market as the first port of call in social 
provisioning and public welfare as port of last resort focused on the deserving 
poor who are not able to meet their own social provisioning. The latter 
addresses diswelfares in both the ways we pursue development and design 
production activities, and respond to needs at various stages of the life-cycle.

Over the last thirty years, in response to Africa’s development challenges and 
diswelfares that its citizens face, a more residual take on social policy has 
become largely hegemonic, with powerful external and local actors using the 
continent as site of a range of social experiments. Much of this has been 
driven by an anti-development thinking that imagines the solution to poverty as 
largely a matter of “just give money to the poor”—even as the ‘poor’ are 
defined in highly restrictive fashion to cover a smaller proportion of the 
population experiencing severe entitlement failure—or a direct distribution of 
earnings from mineral wealth to citizens (a question of ‘oil to cash’). Missing 
from such propositions is a structural approach to understanding the bases of 
entitlement failure, poverty and inequality. There is a general refusal to the 
engage with the maladjustment of Africa’s economies, deepening their structural 
weaknesses. The economies are no less subject to vagaries of external forces in 
the second decade of the twenty-first century than they were in the eighth 
decade of the twentieth. The social dislocations and citizens’ diswelfares, 
even in the context of improved growth on the back of commodity super boom, 
have not shown commensurate reduction. In most instances, the diswelfares have 
deepened. Wealth-based measures of inequality have worsened in much of the 
continent, and poverty rate (measured at $3.10 PPP/day) is above 70% of the 
population in several countries.

It is a public policy regime sustained by an alliance of domestic and external 
actors. If we understand the relations between state and citizens as a web of 
rights and obligations, the retreat of the state from socialised and universal 
social provisioning undermines the legitimacy of the state, reinforces its more 
coercive face in its engagements with citizens, and undermines social cohesion. 
Leaving citizens to fend for themselves in the market place makes them subjects 
of the vagaries of the market. Neither is there evidence that reducing social 
policy to social assistance, which is narrowly focused on the deserving poor in 
increasingly dualistic social policy regimes, eliminates poverty or ensures 
quality services for the poor.

Beyond this, of course, is the lack of appreciation that social policy (or even 
social protection) is not simply about the relief of poverty. Progressive 
social policy is fundamentally about ensuring human flourishing. It does this 
by enhancing the productive capacity of citizens through public investment in 
education, healthcare, housing, etc.; reconciling “the burden of reproduction 
with that of other social tasks” (Mkandawire 2011); it is about protecting 
people from the vagaries of life throughout the life-cycle; it pays attention 
to the distributive outcome of economic performance; and it should advance 
social cohesion (and achieving the nation-building objectives so vital in the 
African context). It does all these more efficiently through a ‘prophylactic’ 
approach of preventing vulnerability rather than waiting to attend to it after 
people have fallen through the cracks.

Whether in the more progressive welfare regimes in the North or the 
post-colonial experiences of the South (and Africa more so), successful 
advancement in human wellbeing has always involved the integration of social 
and economic policies and constructing social policy regimes focused on its 
multiple tasks. Public provisioning of education, healthcare, housing, as 
social investment, on the basis of solidarity and advancing equality supports 
economic development. Economic development grounded in the same norms of 
solidarity and advancing equality ensures the resources necessary for the 
extension of social policy. The objectives of social policy measures are not 
only prophylactic but aimed at being transformative of the economy, social 
relations, social institutions, and deepening democracy.

The DST/NRF SARChI Chair in Social Policy and its partners invite abstracts of 
papers to be presented at the 2017 Social Policy in Africa Conference. The 
conference will take place from 20-22 November 2017 at the University of South 
Africa (Pretoria, South Africa). We invite abstracts and papers that offer 
critical reflections on (a) Africa’s experience with social policy since 
Africa’s decade of independence in the 1960s, (b) contemporary experiences of 
social policy, and (c) prospective inquiries into social policy for addressing 
Africa’s diverse challenges of developmental and human wellbeing. As the heart 
of the conference is theorising Africa’s social policy experiences (formal and 
non-formal) in rethinking social policy.

The call for this conference is premised on the need to return to a wider 
vision of social policy and a more holistic development project that requires 
rethinking social policy and economic development in a manner that reinforces 
the complementarity of economic and social policies. It is a comprehensive 
approach that should take cognisance that a significant share of Africa’s 
population is still in the rural area. In this regard, it calls for reflections 
on how the multiple tasks of social policy can be activated to enhance the 
quality of lives for the rural population. How do we understand land and 
agrarian reforms from a social policy perspective?

In the same vein, we invite research-based papers that offer reflection on 
diversity of traditional conceptions of mutual support and collective efforts 
that simultaneously enhance production and protect against the vagaries of life.

We invite abstracts and papers in the following thematic areas:


1.         Social Policy in Africa’s Development Context: redressing poverty, 
reducing inequality, promoting development.

2.         Rethinking Social Policy: African insights in theorising social 
policy.

3.         Social Policymaking in Africa: actors, agency, and policy space.

4.         Poverty and Inequality in Africa.

5.         Redressing Health Inequalities: ensuring access to quality 
healthcare.

6.         Pension Systems Reform and Income Security in Old Age.

7.         Critical Perspectives on Social Protection.

8.         Non-Formal Social Provisioning: the African Experiences.

9.         Land and Agrarian Reform: the social policy perspectives.

Deadlines:
Deadline for Abstracts: Thursday, 01 September 2017. Authors of accepted 
abstracts will be informed by Friday, 08 September 2017.

Deadline for full papers of accepted abstracts: Friday, 20 October 2017

Submission of Abstracts:
Click 
here<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScsvTYplGNXJ_x3icYmHAoY7df2DFwyTi76q1E39jqx9zIhUg/viewform?entry.1735054503&entry.178013929&entry.36935942&entry.1556369182&entry.479301265&entry.2136281868&entry.29515617&entry.604323525>
 to access the abstracts submission page.

Travel Support Grants:
A very limited number of travel support grants is available for accepted paper 
presenters.

Please direct all enquiries to:

Ms Ipeleng Chauke
Administrator
2017 Social Policy in Africa Conference
E-mail: sarch...@unisa.ac.za<mailto:sarch...@unisa.ac.za>
Tel: +27 12 337 6114.

Post-Conference Activities

We plan to publish a selected number of the papers presented at the conference 
in a special edition of Africa Development. A larger number of papers will be 
published as an edited volume of papers. We will be approaching CODESRIA and 
UNISA Press for a joint publication arrangement for the edited volume of 
papers. In the alternative, we will be proposing a publication arrangement with 
CODESRIA under the imprint of Amalion Publishing (Dakar, Senegal).

_______________________________________________
Codesria-News mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/codesria-news
To unsubscribe, email codesria-news-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
CODESRIA http://www.codesria.org
Facebook.com/pages/CODESRIA/181817969495
Twitter: @codesria

Reply via email to