I believe I have solved both problems. Since I had two installations on the same machine, I gave the 1.9.2 install a different path in httpd.conf, so that I could still access both of them. Therefore, I needed to define codestriker_css in the config file. Since I did not, I was getting a header that did not reference the .css file or the .js files correctly.
No .css explains the colorization. I suspect the latency problems were related to this somehow. It also explains why there were a few other anomalies, such as the fact that the 'help' link did not take me to help. I may be ready to upgrade finally!! On 2/1/07, David & Andriani Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have a 1.9.1 deployed for general use on our CVS server. I > installed 1.9.2 recently on the same server. It also references the > same database. > > The 1.9.2 installation is currently only for my testing purposes, not > generally available. I am ready to switch over, except for two > issues. > > 1. The response time from the 1.9.2 installation is awful. > > Does anyone know why there should be such a difference? Is there > anything I can do to determine the cause of the latency? > > 2. Also, the 1.9.2 installation is not colorizing the pages, including > the topic list (no alternate dark/light), the diff (no colors for > removed/changed/added), etc. I have been over the config files and > cannot see any differences besides new comments added in 1.9.2. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Codestriker-user mailing list Codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codestriker-user
