Looking through the documentation I think we are hitting this problem: "This file should then be selected for the "Topic text upload" field. The "Start tag", "End tag" and "Module" fields have no relevance in this situation. Because of an issue in Subversion, running the svn diff command outside of the repository root will not allow Codestriker to download and review the full file (although the patch segments can still be reviewed). If you commit your code first, then let Codestriker make the diff, as explained in the next section, then you can avoid this limitation."
I'll check and see how the problematic Topics were created. Chris -----Original Message----- From: Chris Welch Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 11:34 AM To: 'codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: RE: [Codestriker-user] Parallel view bug using SVN, get uninitialized value error I tried the code change and the Parallel display still comes up empty. Do we have to recreate the Topic for this code change to have effect (I.e. the change is used during Topic creation, not dynamically during Topic display)? Tx, Chris From: Chris Welch Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:44 AM To: codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Codestriker-user] Parallel view bug using SVN, get uninitialized value error Great, tx gentlemen I'll look into both of these suggestions. I suspect the different branch is the most likely cause as many of our projects make heavy use of externals. Chris From: David Carson [mailto:dccar...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:29 AM To: David Sitsky Cc: Chris Welch; codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Codestriker-user] Parallel view bug using SVN, get uninitialized value error This couldn't have to do with 'highlight' being defined, but no highlight utility being installed, could it? Seems like when I hit that particular error, it showed up as data not being retrieved as expected. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:42 AM, David Sitsky <david.sit...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Chris, That error message in the logs basically indicates that no data was retrieved from the subversion server for some reason. Normally the logs would contain some information about it. I've sometimes seen this issue happen in the past where the revisions were created on different branches that what the repository is based off. In Subversion.pm: http://codestriker.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/codestriker/codestriker/lib/Codestriker/Repository/Subversion.pm?revision=1.29&view=markup around line 77, you could try replacing: push @args, @{ $self->{userCmdLine} }; push @args, $self->{repository_url} . '/' . $filename . '@' . $revision; with push @args, '-r'; push @args, $revision; push @args, @{ $self->{userCmdLine} }; push @args, $self->{repository_url} . '/' . $filename; to see if it makes any difference. There was some semantic differences with how subversion treats @r retrievals vs -r retrievals. A long time ago, somebody made the change to use @r retrievals Cheers, David On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Chris Welch <chris.we...@jdsu.com> wrote: > Using Codestriker 1.9.10 with SVN 1.6. Patches are typically created using > TortoiseSVN 1.6.2 (right click, generate patch). > > Most of the time this works but we have some Topics that the full file > content is blank when you do a Parallel view. This failure occurs regardless > of browser. > > The Apache log shows the following error for this request: > > [Tue Feb 28 11:27:37 2012] [error] [client 10.13.36.124] [Tue Feb 28 11:27:37 > 2012] codestriker.pl: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or > string at /var/www/codestriker/lib/Codestriker/Action/ViewTopicFile.pm line > 113., referer: > http://aontools/codestriker/codestriker.pl?action=view&topic=2687633&mode=2&fview=0 > > The code in question is: > > # Output those lines leading up to the start of the next delta. > # Build up a delta with no changes, and render it. > my $next_delta_linenumber = $delta->{old_linenumber}; > for (my $i = $old_linenumber; $i < $next_delta_linenumber; $i++) { > $delta_text .= " $filedata[$i]\n"; > $old_linenumber++; > > with the failure occurring at the delta_text concatenation (I.e. > $filedata[$i] is uninitialized). > > Any ideas on how to fix or work around this? > > Tx, > > Chris Welch > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Codestriker-user mailing list > Codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codestriker-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Codestriker-user mailing list Codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codestriker-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Codestriker-user mailing list Codestriker-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/codestriker-user
