Kenne VMS erst seit ca. 1984. Ist eindeutig der gr�ssere Saurier :-)
Cheers,
Bernd
On 13 Feb 2003 at 15:42, Sebastian Krampe wrote:
> Apple DOS und VMS sind in etwa gleich alt: Beide von 1978.
> Apple DOS 3.1 war �brigens die erste Version �berhaupt. Eine Version
> 1.0 etc gab es nie wirklich.
>
> Gru�
> Sebastian
>
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bernhard Spuida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2003 15:32
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [Coffeehouse] OT: Welches Betriebssystem bist *Du*?
>
>
> Tach!
>
> Wirklich merkw�rdig, da� ich da Apple Dos 3.1 erwischt habe. H�tte
> irgendwas saurierm�ssig fossiles wie VMS erwartet :-) Cheers,
>
> Bernd
>
> On 13 Feb 2003 at 15:19, Thomas Beckert wrote:
>
> > mhhh.. anscheinend ist jeder ein debian linux clone. ich auch... um
> > windows status zu erreichen, muss man wahrscheinlich die letzte
> > rotze antworten...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Wolfgang Kluge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Coffeehouse] OT: Welches Betriebssystem bist *Du*?
> >
> >
> > > Ich bin ein Debian Linux(-Clone) :(
> > > Zu H�lf, wie krieg ich das nur wieder weg...
> > >
> > > Wolfgang
> > >
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sponsored by United
> > > Planet~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kaffeepause im United Planet
> > > Communityserver ... http://www.intrexx.com/communityserver
> > > _______________________________________________ Coffeehouse
> > > mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse
> > >
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sponsored by United
> > Planet~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kaffeepause im United Planet Communityserver
> > ... http://www.intrexx.com/communityserver
> > _______________________________________________ Coffeehouse mailing
> > list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse
> >
>
> A bureaucracy is like a computer program. Usually, the question is
> how to arrange it so that what you want is composed of operations that
> the bureaucracy supports. In addition, in any bureaucracy, there is
> always *someone* whose job is to approve violations of the rules.
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sponsored by United Planet~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Kaffeepause im United Planet Communityserver ...
> http://www.intrexx.com/communityserver
> _______________________________________________ Coffeehouse mailing
> list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse
>
>
> .
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sponsored by United Planet~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Kaffeepause im United Planet Communityserver ...
> http://www.intrexx.com/communityserver
> _______________________________________________ Coffeehouse mailing
> list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse
>
A bureaucracy is like a computer program. Usually, the question is
how to arrange it so that what you want is composed of operations
that the
bureaucracy supports. In addition, in any bureaucracy, there is
always
*someone* whose job is to approve violations of the rules.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~sponsored by United Planet~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kaffeepause im United Planet Communityserver ...
http://www.intrexx.com/communityserver
_______________________________________________
Coffeehouse mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse
