On 11/28/05, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to the ColdSpring list Scott!
Thanks ;) heh. > We've been looking at / thinking about the CFAdapter and how it will > fit into our remoting plans. I think we will be going in the > direction of offering 2 types if RemitingProxyFactories, one relying > on the CFadapter, one using the mapping utility class for legacy / > non-flex apps. One thing is certain, flex developers is a key target > audience for ColdSpring. Sounds like a reasonable plan. One thing to note though from personal experience, is the transition between FLEX based VO to CF, now we all know we don't have the luxury of type casting our variables through simple declarations so instead we rely on the set/get approach. What would be cool in terms of automatic translation is the Flex VO to CFBO. I noticed that someone here was working on the translation to TO? that too would suffice. At anyrate, really into the framework and feels good to come back to CF (been in FLEX land for too long) and see the new toys > Chris > > On Nov 28, 2005, at 7:05 AM, Scott Barnes wrote: > > > Sorry, wasn't sure if my email-mic-test was working. > > > > BTW: The new CFAdapter should negate the need to resolve Mappings from > > ASObject to CFC, it should do all that for you? > > > > ie: > > com.mossyblog.cfc.testVO returned out *should* resolve to > > com.mossyblog.as.testVO auto-magically instead of having to do > > ASObject.setType(), ASObject.put() approach (ie FLEX 1.5 approach). > > > > > > > > On 11/28/05, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ping. > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Scott Barnes > >> http://www.mossyblog.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Scott Barnes > > http://www.mossyblog.com > > > > > -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com
