--Kurt
On 3/4/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point Sean, I will change it to instanceDataMethod.
--KurtOn 3/3/06, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:On 3/2/06, Kurt Wiersma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <entry
> key="toMethodName"><value>getInstanceData</value></entry>
That's a nasty key name... It really doesn't convey what it does. Perhaps:
<entry key="instanceDataMethod"><value>getInstanceData</value></entry>
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret AtwoodOn 3/3/06, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I agree as well (sorry, it way require tweaks is a few places). Is
there something really simple as far as a property name?
instanceDataMethod, that's pretty descriptive I think. What's
simpler, instanceAccessor? dataAccessor? Hell I don't know, my head
hurts
On Mar 3, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Dave Ross wrote:
> i concur w/ Sean...
>
> On 3/2/06, Sean Corfield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 3/2/06, Kurt Wiersma < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> <entry
>>> key="toMethodName"><value>getInstanceData</value></entry>
>>
>> That's a nasty key name... It really doesn't convey what it does.
>> Perhaps:
>>
>> <entry key="instanceDataMethod"><value>getInstanceData</value></
>> entry>
>> --
>> Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
>> Got frameworks?
>>
>> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
>> -- Margaret Atwood
>>
>>
>
