just got redemption on that hit- no speed checks this time, all stomp!
On 3/6/06, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Inheriting an init() is another case where I'm not sure
> >> whether to support that or not - I'm of the opinion that all CFC's
> >> should have an init() no matter what - sure we support ones that
> >> don't
> >> but I'm not sure we should be calling init() if it doesn't exist in
> >> the concrete CFC.
> >
> > I agree in principle.
>
> I'm pretty sure I also agree in principle, but I think we're going to
> have to look at the changing landscape of coldfusion. With the
> introduction of newer frameworks we need to find a balance so we can
> be able to mix well with other coldfusion technologies without
> jeopardizing our own framework's abilities.
>
> >
> >> regardless, we should probably refactor the metadata "gathering" into
> >> a separate utility class, then we can only have to tweak this in one
> >> place in the future. thoughts on that?
> >
> > Looking at the way it is used, I don't believe that would be the right
> > solution. If you do that, then you have calls to accumulate all the
> > function metadata followed by loops through that metadata - so you'll
> > be looping twice and, unless you convert the metadata from an array to
> > a struct, you'll be copying arrays left, right and center.
>
> Damn good point, I was thinking about this on the way to work this
> morning. I was thinking about how we would make a structure of found
> methods and their parameters, and realized we may be building a huge
> structure on top of the current group of objects that represent
> ColdSpring managed cfcs. Nothing was sitting too nicely, and also I
> think we need to step up support for walking inheritance trees. What
> may work on one place (aop discovering methods to intercept for one
> thing) may not work on other places, like autowiring.
>
> >
> >> Well, I came up short on a jump yesterday and have a sore ankle,
> >> knee,
> >> groin, back, and neck. Heading back out for revenge now... :)
> >
> > Bummer! Make the snow pay for its insolence!
>
> Obviously the problem here was you weren't going fast enough, or
> jumping high enough! You should be trying the 50' jumps, don't pussy
> foot around those little kickers on the bunny hills! More amplitude
> (and wear an iPod too!)
>
> Hope you feel better, last time I fell snowboarding I was on pain
> killers and muscle relaxers for 4 months...
>
>
> > --
> > Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
> > Got frameworks?
> >
> > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> > -- Margaret Atwood
> >
>
>
>
