Oh yeah, the name of the scope. I originally had it so that you
passed in a ref to the scope, but there was a very good reason why I
changed that to be the name of the scope. Now if I could only
remember what that reason was, we'd be golden. But believe me, at the
time, it was much better this way. Whatever that was...
On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:13 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
On 3/9/06, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before we all get too crazy trying to figure out how to have an
object
become auto wired with the bean factory, ColdSpring already
provides a
ServiceLocator type utility to manage the location of the bean
factory for
you, in a provided scope.
Ah, very cool... and it takes the name of the scope?
Still, it does kind of emphasize the "don't have managed beans depend
on the container" kinda thing...
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Got frameworks?
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
