At the risk of sounding "me too!", I'm with Chris on this. The component should have a real constructor, not just inherit one. I think this is an important convention and I think it's reasonable for ColdSpring to require it.
On 5/4/06, Chris Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we are to follow conventions that init method is treated as a constructor, I would have to disagree on the issue of ColdSpring picking up a superclass constructor by itself. This is outside of the normal behavior of object oriented language. If you would like to call the constructor for a superclass in an extended class I really think you should be calling super.init() in the init method in the extended class. Just my 2 cents there...
