The more I look at it, the less I like it... sorry...
I can see the problem you are trying to solve, but I've yet to find a case in which it can't be solved by bean factories. Just my 2c. Mark On 9/23/06, Jared Rypka-Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The more I think about this idea the less I like it... And the more I like it... But it presents some difficulties that seem to be difficult to overcome, like preventing access to other scopes/functions (createObject() in the XML? Lordy no!) to be worthwhile. I shall continue to ponder. Laterz, J On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:58:22 -0700 "Hayes, Kyle D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with you, Matt. I think that is seems like a good > idea at first > because it makes it more convenient. However, I think > that it is > probably to allow a framework to do what it does best and > just that. > Bringing in a function to evaluate ColdFusion functions > in the XML code > just makes it more confusing for the developer that has > to maintain > it..."CF code in the xml file?"
-- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com
