Colext/Macondo
Cantina virtual de los COLombianos en el EXTerior
--------------------------------------------------

Dice Coreya en SCC: Será que a Colombia le va a tocar votar a favor de USA
cuando este asunto llegue a las Naciones Unidas?

____________________
China Is Right
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/chinaisright.html

by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

The US government has flipped its lid on this China spy plane mess.
So have many commentators who are refusing to come to terms with
some very obvious facts. Once you blow away the fog, you can see
that if anyone should be protesting right now, it is American
citizens against their own government.

Number one: the collision between the US spy plane and the Chinese
jet occurred along Chinas border. Think about that and you can
understand why China is so unhappy.

Now, the US claims it was in "international airspace," but backs
up this claim with a rule arrived at unilaterally by the US government
and accepted by no one else. The US makes up rules to justify its
behavior, rules that US does not accept if applied against US
territory.

The space where the collision occurred is normally used to facilitate
commerce, not hostile military activities. But in US foreign policy,
there is a presumption that the whole world is a playground for
the US government to do what it wants.

Number two: the US plane was a spy plane. Say it three times: it
was a spy plane. It was not a commercial airliner. Hence it is
preposterous for the US to say that a spy plane landing in Chinese
territory is somehow sovereign property. The international law on
this subject applies to civil aviation.

The US spy plane was seeking to intercept communications and rip
off information for US military advantage, probably at the behest
of Chinas unfriendly neighbors. This makes it an aggressor against
China, just as the US considers any attempt to spy on us to be an
aggression and evidence of hostility.

Number three: the US spy plane landed at a Chinese military airport.
The US crew never asked permission to do so. Imagine what the US
would do if a Chinese spy plane were zipping around outside Virginia,
became entangled with US jets, and then landed at a US base. The
US would not say: "Sorry, guys, about interrupting your spy mission.
Thanks for visiting our military base and come back soon."

Number four: the Chinese pilot is dead. The US crew is not. Also
still dead are the three Chinese journalists who died when the US
bombed the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia in 1999. No US soldiers
died in that incident either.  The carnage is beginning to mount,
and, no surprise, that at some point the Chinese decide theyre not
going to take it anymore. How long can one country be subjected to
murderous attacks from the US before it begins to complain? But if
they do complain, this is decried in the US as "nationalism."

Number five: there is no mystery about how the US treats such cases.
In 1976, a Soviet MIG carrying a defector landed in Japan. The
Soviets demanded the plane back. The US complied after taking the
entire thing apart. It was sent back to Moscow in packing crates.

On another occasion in the 1970s, the US secretly tried to raise
a Soviet submarine from the ocean. We use any means possible to
obtain military equipment from potentially hostile nations. So
turnabout is fair play.

Number Six: the US spy plane was not an innocent victim. No one
can say for sure how the collision occurred, but it seems obvious
that the US version of events  a spy plane minding its own business
gets bumped by a Chinese jet isnt true. This was a case of the kind
of cat-and-mouse that cars play on highways all the time.

If it turns out that the US is wholly to blame, it wouldnt be the
first time. A couple of years ago, American fighter pilots cut ski
cables in Italy, killing 20 civilians with their recklessness. And
just recently, show-offs and goof-offs cruising the world in a
submarine sunk a Japanese school boat, killing nine, four of whom
were 17-year-old kids.

Number Seven: the US has fulminated for years about supposed spying
by China against the US. Remember the Cox Report? For all of its
bluster, it never went so far as to accuse China of flying spy
planes around our borders. But it turns out that the US regards
such activity as routine and justifiable, if directed against other
countries.

The message is obvious: the US can do whatever it wants with its
military, but believes itself exempt from the very laws it wants
to apply to others.  This attitude engenders hatred around the
world.

Though no one in the US cares to remember, the Chinese have not
forgotten the US role in the so-called Opium Wars. In this 19th-century
drug war, military force was used to addict the Chinese to drugs
so as to create customers for opium. Nor have they forgotten the
Boxer Rebellion, when US troops  in pursuit of continuing economic
control  burned and looted the ancient imperial compound. Nor, to
take more recent examples, have they forgotten the US threatening
them twice in the 1950s with nuclear annihilation for responding
to huge Taiwanese troop movements to the islands of Quemoy and
Matsu near the mainland.

To say there are double standards at work here is a wild understatement.
Despite all the mistreatment, Beijing doesnt want war. It wants
the US to behave like a responsible trading partner, not the world
hegemon it has become. But there is only so much humiliation and
bloodshed that a nation can be subjected to before its citizens
demand reprisal.

Washington probably doesnt want war either. What it wants is a
license to spy on and otherwise invade the world, killing and
maiming whenever the time seems right, and never having to be held
responsible. Washington wants what every bully wants: the freedom
to beat people up and never pay the price.  American citizens should
join their friends across the ocean and protest US imperial
adventures. Our heritage is one of peace. Our founders tried to
create a system that would prevent the establishment of a world
military empire. It is our moral duty to criticize such an
establishment when it threatens to upset peaceful commercial ties,
which in the Chinese case are extensive and magnificent.

At minimum, we must demand that US commentators cut out the absurd
Cold War language of belligerency, lies, and reprisal. China has
never done anything to us. We must demand that our own government
stop the spying, bombing, and killing. No American citizen benefits
from the US empire. But we each have much to gain from having it
dismantled.

There is only one evil empire alive in the world today, and it is
not China.



April 6, 2001
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., is president of the Ludwig von Mises
Institute in Auburn, Alabama. He also edits a daily news site,
LewRockwell.com.  Copyright

 2001 LewRockwell.com



--------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    with UNSUBSCRIBE COLEXT as the BODY of the message.

    Un archivo de colext puede encontrarse en:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
    cortesia de Anibal Monsalve Salazar

Responder a