One last thing, the parameters would be these: WriteQueueLimitHigh HighNum WriteQueueLimitLow LowNum
Correct?? Thanks, Joel. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Joel Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: > So, an update here: > > Gathering CPU + 3 SNMP OIDs: > > 23:20:30.342653 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308 > 23:21:20.341185 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308 > 23:22:10.341337 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308 > 23:23:00.341386 IP 10.0.X.X.59192 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1308 > > (50s approx) > > Now, I added the memory. (CPU + 3 SNMP OIDs + MEMORY) > > New results: > > 23:24:11.226821 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1309 > 23:24:31.288530 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1293 > 23:25:01.273344 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1318 > 23:25:31.257782 IP 10.0.X.X.47903 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1300 > > (30s approx) > > Now, I added interface and disk. (CPU + 3 SNMP OIDs + MEMORY + DISK + > INTERFACE) > > 23:26:31.466675 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1328 > 23:26:41.465791 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1301 > 23:26:51.465875 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1306 > 23:27:01.511527 IP 10.0.X.X.48354 > 10.0.Z.Z.25826: UDP, length 1292 > > (10s approx) > > This obviously means the more data, the faster you fill the buffer, the > more often you send the metrics. > > All these tests are with the default value for queues/buffers/limits. > > I am going to play with those values now and compare the results to these. > > > I'll update again later. > > Joel. > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Giovanni Torres < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:22 PM Joel Serrano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Well I really think it could be what Marc said. >>> >>> On v5.5 until the buffer is full it won't wend anything (anywhere...). >>> >>> I'm going to lower the buffer and see if the reporting time decreases, >>> if Marc is right, it should work. >>> >>> I'll post back the results. >>> >> >> I'm curious to hear your results. How much did you lower the buffer size >> to vs how many metrics are you handing? >> >> Giovanni >> > >
_______________________________________________ collectd mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.verplant.org/listinfo/collectd
