Hi Alexandro, On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:39:01AM -0600, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > Ok after being digging through the OpenOffice.org site, I find that the > maarten brouwers was the one to apply the change here > (http://download.openoffice.org/source/browse/download/www/2.1.0/index.html?sortby=date). >
Yes, he is the one who put the bouncer page back into place, but in the context you're trying to come up with this leads to a wrong impression > I also found that it was debated on the website project. My question here > is if Website project. It was mention through this thread: > http://website.openoffice.org/servlets/SearchList?list=dev&searchText=bouncer&defaultField=body&Search=Search > > Also it was tested by other members such as cloph and had a testing site > here: http://website.openoffice.org/tryouts/cloph/bouncer.html > > So I take back my rant on 'cold implementation' however, I do want to > wonder about the connection -- or disconnection between the marketing and > the website project. Since mktng needs to connect to the other projects > like NL and Arts to generate the correct awareness. I have no clue what the marketing project should have to do with this. Fact is: Bouncer failed to add the files for some reason this time. This worked fine in the past. Because of the files not being available on bouncer, you got presented with the bouncers' download selection. Usually you don't get to that page, you get to the download directly. ciao Christian -- NP: Silverchair - Satin Sheets --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
