Apple has the usual problem with the image they've built on 
themselves: They give the impression that they're idealistic and 
revolutionary. Especially the press is usually very eager to forget 
that Apple is still just an ordinary company. Basically there hasn't 
been anything idealistic or revolutionary in anything Apple has done. 
Ever.

The _thing_ of Apple has always been the sense of style. Actually all 
the other computer companies lack that thing. And that's very 
commercial stuff. So, I don't see, what's so special or negative in 
making just another cool product by Apple. That's simply something 
they've always made: things that keep the sense of style from the 
power button to the interface design.

Everything Apple has ever made, has always been cosmetic. And all 
the problems they have ever had, have resided under the hood of their 
cool products.

> Changes announced
> for the iMac "were literally cosmetic,"

Well, who has claimed that they were something else than cosmetic 
changes? ... 

> "One member of the Mac press once said the new operating sys-
> tem is called OS X because that is the number of years that 
Macintosh 
> users have been waiting for the new OS," wrote the BBC's Kevin 
Anderson.

If someone has waited for a UNIX-based Mac for ten years, then he has 
been living in a dream world. Then again, I can still wait for the 
UNIX-based Mac OS X for one year. No problems with that.

> Jobs and NeXT in 1988. "Job's NeXT Cube was meant to transform the PC
> business," wrote Wired's Michelle Delio. It didn't.

Well, better later than never... You don't need to be a cynical 
columnist to notice the similarities between G4 Cube and NeXT Cube. 
Even a stupid alchoholic from Turku, Finland, noticed it. And his 
question is: "So, what?"

> One Mac consultant
> quoted by Wired questioned the G4 Cube's computing power, but said,
> "it's a great looking machine all the same, and I can't wait to get 
my
> hands on it to try it out." The thing has more infatuated admirers
> than Britney Spears.

At least it's not _as_ stupid... I hope...


Reply via email to