.................................
To leave Commie, hyper to
http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html
.................................



-------- Original Message --------



A history professor from Uppsala University in Sweden, called to tell
a colleague at a local college in Halifa about an article she had read in
which a Zimbabwe politician was quoted as saying that children should
study this event closely for it shows that election fraud is not only a 
third
world phenomena.

  1.  Imagine that we read of an election occuring anywhere in the third
world  in which the self-declared winner was the son of the former
prime  minister  and that former prime minister was himself the former head
of  that nation's  secret police (cia).

  2.  Imagine that the self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won
  based on some old colonial holdover (electoral college) from the
  nation's pre-democracy past.

3.  Imagine that the self-declared winner's 'victory' turned on
disputed votes cast in a province governed by his brother!

  4.  Imagine that the poorly drafted ballots of one district, a district
  heavily favoring the self-declared winner's opponent, led thousands of
  voters to vote for the wrong candidate.

  5.  Imagine that that members of that nation's most despised caste,
fearing  for their lives/livelihoods, turned out in record numbers to
vote in  near-universal opposition to the self-declared winner's
candidacy.

  6.  Imagine that hundreds of members of that most-despised caste were
  intercepted on their way to the polls by state police operating under
  the  authority of the self-declared winner's brother.

  7.  Imagine that six million people voted in the disputed province and
  that  the self-declared winner's 'lead' was only 327 votes.  Fewer,
  certainly, than the vote counting machines' margin of error.

8.  Imagine that the self-declared winner and his political party
opposed a  more careful by-hand inspection and re-counting of the
  ballots in the disputed province or in its most hotly disputed
district.

  9.  Imagine that the self-declared winner, himself a governor of a
  major  province, had the worst human rights record of any province in
his nation and actually led the nation in executions.

10. Imagine that a major campaign promise of the self-declared winner
  was to appoint like-minded human rights violators to lifetime positions
  on the high court of that nation.

None of us would deem such an election to be representative of anything
other than the self-declared winner's will-to-power.  All of us, I
imagine, would wearily turn the page thinking that it was another sad
tale of pitiful pre- or anti-democracy peoples in some strange
elsewhere."



Reply via email to