.................................
To leave Commie, hyper to
http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html
.................................
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, istari wrote:
>
> >the power of reaktor makes my head hurt. i've had it for months and i know
> >just a little bit about how to build a synth from the ground up. it's a
> >lot of fun, though.
uuh, software synthesis is pretty good nowadays but nothing really beats
the real thing - trust me. i've been playing around with both, and the
original analogue is something completely different than some software
synth. sure, oldies are difficult to get and might cost quite a lot so
soft synths might be choice for many. it's been long since i last time
played with reaktor, but as i now have faster pc, it might give me some
kicks on new songs.. who knows.
> hm.. i tryed theoretical build a synth for month ( years ? ), just gathered
> informations on synth, collect shematics of different parts (vco, noise, vcf etc.),
>but to build a hardware one. Problem was it would cost to much and
> maybe i would end up with a pile of garbage electronics.
>
> But a this would just be some kind of analog synth, FM synths are interesting to i
>found out now.
and cheap. even any old sb16 for that... and setup could be:
some old 486 with n mb ram + hd
win 3.11
cubase 2.8
sb16
and wow! you've got nice midicontrollable FM synthesis!
> Maybe because i didnt know how do combine all the operators to get the sound
> i want...i just add them mindless and wonder what came out of it :)
best way to *compile* anything, even *nix kernels. ;)
sakke
--
working at http://www.teraflops.com/
website at http://www.vip.fi/~sakke/
