H.J. Lu, le mar. 07 janv. 2025 09:49:12 +0800, a ecrit: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025, 9:40 AM Samuel Thibault <[1][email protected]> > wrote: > > htl's pt-alloc.c calls __mempcpy, which is #defined to > __builtin_mempcpy, but which does not happen to get inlined (the size is > dynamic), and then gcc emits a reference to mempcpy, thus violating > symbol exposition standard. We thus also have to redirect such > references to __mempcpy too. > --- > include/string.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/string.h b/include/string.h > index 1f6aef9f93..b9c41b0eea 100644 > --- a/include/string.h > +++ b/include/string.h > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ extern __typeof (strnlen) strnlen attribute_hidden; > extern __typeof (strsep) strsep attribute_hidden; > #endif > > -#if IS_IN (libc) && !defined SHARED \ > +#if (IS_IN (libc) || IS_IN (libpthread)) && !defined SHARED \ > && !defined NO_MEMPCPY_STPCPY_REDIRECT > /* Redirect calls to __builtin_mempcpy and __builtin_stpcpy to call > __mempcpy and __stpcpy if not inlined. */ > -- > 2.45.2 > > > OK.
Pushed, thanks! Samuel
