Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package libsignal-protocol-c for 
openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2026-02-24 16:27:24
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/libsignal-protocol-c (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.libsignal-protocol-c.new.1977 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "libsignal-protocol-c"

Tue Feb 24 16:27:24 2026 rev:6 rq:1334730 version:2.3.3

Changes:
--------
--- 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/libsignal-protocol-c/libsignal-protocol-c.changes    
    2020-03-30 23:05:09.256236362 +0200
+++ 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.libsignal-protocol-c.new.1977/libsignal-protocol-c.changes
      2026-02-24 16:27:25.448003576 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,6 @@
+Tue Feb 24 12:52:13 UTC 2026 - Michael Vetter <[email protected]>
+
+- CVE-2022-48468: Integer overflow in parse_required_member in protobuf-c 
(bsc#1210323)
+  * Add CVE-2022-48468.patch taken from Fedora
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

New:
----
  CVE-2022-48468.patch

----------(New B)----------
  New:- CVE-2022-48468: Integer overflow in parse_required_member in protobuf-c 
(bsc#1210323)
  * Add CVE-2022-48468.patch taken from Fedora
----------(New E)----------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ libsignal-protocol-c.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.IWzgp2/_old  2026-02-24 16:27:26.636052964 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.IWzgp2/_new  2026-02-24 16:27:26.640053131 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package libsignal-protocol-c
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2020 SUSE LLC
+# Copyright (c) 2026 SUSE LLC and contributors
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 Group:          Development/Libraries/C and C++
 URL:            https://github.com/signalapp/libsignal-protocol-c/
 Source:         
https://github.com/signalapp/%{name}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
+Patch0:         CVE-2022-48468.patch
 BuildRequires:  check-devel >= 0.9.10
 BuildRequires:  cmake >= 2.8.4
 BuildRequires:  gcc-c++
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@
 The libsignal-protocol-c library is a forward secrecy protocol library written 
in C.
 
 %prep
-%setup -q
+%autosetup -p1
 
 %build
 %cmake \

++++++ CVE-2022-48468.patch ++++++
>From 478dfe51552243b367cf2e9c5d047cbbd3c21635 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Randy Barlow <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:42:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2022-48468: unsigned integer overflow

This commit combines two upstream commits from protobuf-c[0][1].
The first fixes an unsigned integer overflow, and the second fixes a
regression introduced by the first. I originally decided to amend the
commit message of the first to mention that it fixes a CVE, but then I
realized it would be better to bring the fix for the regression together
with it.

https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-48468
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186673

[0]
https://github.com/protobuf-c/protobuf-c/pull/513/commits/289f5c18b195aa43d46a619d1188709abbfa9c82
[1]
https://github.com/protobuf-c/protobuf-c/pull/513/commits/0d1fd124a4e0a07b524989f6e64410ff648fba61

Co-authored-by: 10054172 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: "Todd C. Miller" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: 10054172 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Randy Barlow <[email protected]>
---
 src/protobuf-c/protobuf-c.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/protobuf-c/protobuf-c.c b/src/protobuf-c/protobuf-c.c
index 4f2f5bc..6ae5287 100644
--- a/src/protobuf-c/protobuf-c.c
+++ b/src/protobuf-c/protobuf-c.c
@@ -2456,10 +2456,13 @@ parse_required_member(ScannedMember *scanned_member,
                        return FALSE;
 
                def_mess = scanned_member->field->default_value;
-               subm = 
protobuf_c_message_unpack(scanned_member->field->descriptor,
-                                                allocator,
-                                                len - pref_len,
-                                                data + pref_len);
+               if (len >= pref_len)
+                       subm = 
protobuf_c_message_unpack(scanned_member->field->descriptor,
+                                                        allocator,
+                                                        len - pref_len,
+                                                        data + pref_len);
+               else
+                       subm = NULL;
 
                if (maybe_clear &&
                    *pmessage != NULL &&
-- 
2.39.2

Reply via email to