Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,
here is the log from the commit of package python-dataclasses-json for
openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2026-08-12 16:11:43
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-dataclasses-json (Old)
and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-dataclasses-json.new.17972 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "python-dataclasses-json"
Wed Aug 12 16:11:43 2026 rev:7 rq:1370746 version:0.6.7
Changes:
--------
---
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-dataclasses-json/python-dataclasses-json.changes
2026-06-02 19:54:34.311224540 +0200
+++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-dataclasses-json.new.17972/python-dataclasses-json.changes
2026-08-12 16:12:42.334973997 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,6 @@
+Wed Aug 12 02:23:30 UTC 2026 - Steve Kowalik <[email protected]>
+
+- Add patch no-dataclasses-missing-type.patch:
+ * Do not use internals to check if fields are undefined.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
New:
----
no-dataclasses-missing-type.patch
----------(New B)----------
New:
- Add patch no-dataclasses-missing-type.patch:
* Do not use internals to check if fields are undefined.
----------(New E)----------
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Other differences:
------------------
++++++ python-dataclasses-json.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.UFMLN3/_old 2026-08-12 16:12:43.079005425 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.UFMLN3/_new 2026-08-12 16:12:43.083005594 +0200
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
Patch1: support-python314.patch
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM gh#lidatong/dataclasses-json#577
Patch2: support-marshmallow-4.patch
+# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM gh#lidatong/dataclasses-json#578
+Patch3: no-dataclasses-missing-type.patch
BuildRequires: %{python_module hypothesis}
BuildRequires: %{python_module marshmallow}
BuildRequires: %{python_module mypy}
++++++ no-dataclasses-missing-type.patch ++++++
>From 89d2659a1b2e2eceabedcfac32fce6f22c8ad609 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve Kowalik <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:21:30 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Do not use dataclasses._MISSING_TYPE
dataclasses._MISSING_TYPE was always an internal implemenation detail of
how undefined fields were kept track of, dataclasses.MISSING is the
correct way to check, and as a bonus, doesn't break with Python 3.15.
---
dataclasses_json/undefined.py | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dataclasses_json/undefined.py b/dataclasses_json/undefined.py
index cb8b2cfc..e8f4a5b2 100644
--- a/dataclasses_json/undefined.py
+++ b/dataclasses_json/undefined.py
@@ -174,12 +174,12 @@ def _get_default(catch_all_field: Field) -> Any:
# https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/6910
# noinspection PyProtectedMember
- has_default = not isinstance(catch_all_field.default,
- dataclasses._MISSING_TYPE)
+ has_default = catch_all_field.default is not dataclasses.MISSING
# noinspection PyProtectedMember
- has_default_factory = not isinstance(catch_all_field.default_factory,
- # type: ignore
- dataclasses._MISSING_TYPE)
+ has_default_factory = (
+ catch_all_field.default_factory
+ is not dataclasses.MISSING
+ )
# TODO: black this for proper formatting
default_value: Union[
Type[_CatchAllUndefinedParameters._SentinelNoDefault], Any] =
_CatchAllUndefinedParameters\
