Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package go1.16 for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2021-12-12 21:27:06
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/go1.16 (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.go1.16.new.2520 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "go1.16"

Sun Dec 12 21:27:06 2021 rev:15 rq:938752 version:1.16.12

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/go1.16/go1.16.changes    2021-12-06 
23:59:12.500601295 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.go1.16.new.2520/go1.16.changes  2021-12-12 
21:27:17.412330194 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,12 @@
+Thu Dec  9 17:31:00 UTC 2021 - Jeff Kowalczyk <jkowalc...@suse.com>
+
+- go1.16.12 (released 2021-12-09) includes security fixes to the
+  syscall and net/http packages.
+  Refs boo#1182345 go1.16 release tracking
+  CVE-2021-44716 CVE-2021-44717 
+  * boo#1193598 go#50057 CVE-2021-44717
+  * go#50066 syscall: don???t close fd 0 on ForkExec error
+  * boo#1193597 go#50058 CVE-2021-44716
+  * go#50064 net/http: limit growth of header canonicalization cache
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  go1.16.11.src.tar.gz

New:
----
  go1.16.12.src.tar.gz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ go1.16.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.81QlAr/_old  2021-12-12 21:27:17.960330518 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.81QlAr/_new  2021-12-12 21:27:17.964330521 +0100
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
 %endif
 
 Name:           go1.16
-Version:        1.16.11
+Version:        1.16.12
 Release:        0
 Summary:        A compiled, garbage-collected, concurrent programming language
 License:        BSD-3-Clause

++++++ go1.16.11.src.tar.gz -> go1.16.12.src.tar.gz ++++++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/go1.16/go1.16.11.src.tar.gz 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.go1.16.new.2520/go1.16.12.src.tar.gz differ: char 
144, line 1

Reply via email to