Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package tpm2.0-tools for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2023-01-05 15:00:08
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/tpm2.0-tools (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.tpm2.0-tools.new.1563 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "tpm2.0-tools"

Thu Jan  5 15:00:08 2023 rev:37 rq:1055808 version:5.4

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/tpm2.0-tools/tpm2.0-tools.changes        
2022-12-10 21:17:58.501607951 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.tpm2.0-tools.new.1563/tpm2.0-tools.changes      
2023-01-05 15:00:18.680849009 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,6 @@
+Wed Jan  4 12:56:09 UTC 2023 - Alberto Planas Dominguez <apla...@suse.com>
+
+- Re-disable tests in PPC, PPC64 and S390X and reference issues about
+  endianness unsafe API
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ tpm2.0-tools.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Ne5cid/_old  2023-01-05 15:00:19.272852129 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Ne5cid/_new  2023-01-05 15:00:19.276852150 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package tpm2.0-tools
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2022 SUSE LLC
+# Copyright (c) 2023 SUSE LLC
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -17,7 +17,16 @@
 
 
 %define _lto_cflags %{nil}
+%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 aarch64 %{arm} ppc64le
 %bcond_without  test
+%else
+# ppc ppc64 s390x: some code (tpm2_command_header_from_bytes) depend
+# on the endianness of the architecture:
+#   gh#tpm2-software/tpm2-tools#3055
+#   gh#tpm2-software/tpm2-tools#3060
+#   gh#tpm2-software/tpm2-tools#3061
+%bcond_with     test
+%endif
 Name:           tpm2.0-tools
 Version:        5.4
 Release:        0

Reply via email to