Script 'mail_helper' called by obssrc
Hello community,
here is the log from the commit of package binutils for openSUSE:Factory
checked in at 2023-01-23 18:30:20
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/binutils (Old)
and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.binutils.new.32243 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "binutils"
Mon Jan 23 18:30:20 2023 rev:160 rq:1060010 version:2.39
Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/binutils/binutils.changes 2022-08-13
22:36:32.986626973 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.binutils.new.32243/binutils.changes
2023-01-23 18:30:21.431467134 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,47 @@
+Sat Dec 10 10:00:56 UTC 2022 - Dirk Müller <dmuel...@suse.com>
+
+- fix build on x86_64_vX platforms
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Oct 25 14:52:30 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+- Add binutils-maxpagesize.diff for a problem on old code
+ streams, where we would generate too large binaries.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Oct 25 12:54:34 UTC 2022 - Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de>
+
+- s390-pic-dso.diff: use %pB instead of %B
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Oct 17 15:16:23 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+- SLE toolchain update of binutils. Update to 2.39 from 2.37,
+ which means obsoleting and hence removing these patches:
+ binutils-add-efi-aarch64-1.diff, binutils-add-efi-aarch64-2.diff,
+ binutils-add-efi-aarch64-3.diff, binutils-fix-keepdebug.diff,
+ binutils-add-z16-name.diff.
+ Implements [jsc#SLE-25046, jsc#PED-2029, jsc#PED-2035, jsc#PED-2033,
+ jsc#PED-2030, jsc#PED-2038, jsc#PED-2032, jsc#PED-2034, jsc#PED-2031,
+ jsc#SLE-25047]
+- This fixes these CVEs relative to 2.37:
+ [bsc#1188374, bsc#1185597] aka (GCC) PR99935 aka CVE-2021-3648
+ [bsc#1193929] aka PR28694 aka CVE-2021-45078
+ [bsc#1194783] aka (GCC) PR98886 aka CVE-2021-46195
+ [bsc#1197592] aka (GCC) PR105039 aka CVE-2022-27943
+ [bsc#1202966] aka PR29289 aka CVE-2022-38126
+ [bsc#1202967] aka PR29290 aka CVE-2022-38127
+ [bsc#1202969] aka CVE-2021-3826
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Fri Oct 14 15:22:38 UTC 2022 - Dirk Müller <dmuel...@suse.com>
+
+- add arm32-avoid-copyreloc.patch for PR16177 (bsc#1200962)
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Fri Aug 26 13:24:35 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+- Add binutils-pr29482.diff for PR29482, aka CVE-2022-38533
+ [bsc#1202816]
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -47,0 +95,9 @@
+Mon Jun 13 12:09:35 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+(Fake entry from SLE for tracking purposes:)
+- For building shim 15.6~rc1 (and later versions) aarch64 image, objcopy
+ needs to support efi-app-aarch64 target. (bsc#1198458)
+ Adds binutils-add-efi-aarch64-1.diff,
+ binutils-add-efi-aarch64-2.diff, binutils-add-efi-aarch64-3.diff .
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -65,0 +122,7 @@
+Fri May 6 14:17:19 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+(Fake entry from SLE for tracking purposes:)
+- Add binutils-fix-keepdebug.diff for fix bsc#1191908, a problem
+ in crash not accepting some of our .ko.debug files.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -86,0 +150,10 @@
+Mon Apr 25 16:25:47 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+- Add binutils-revert-rela.diff to revert back to old behaviour
+ of not ignoring the in-section content of to be relocated
+ fields on x86-64, even though that's a RELA architecture.
+ Compatibility with buggy object files generated by old tools.
+ [bsc#1198422]
+ (forward port from SLE)
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,0 +164,7 @@
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Mon Apr 11 13:43:11 UTC 2022 - Michael Matz <m...@suse.com>
+
+(Fake entry from SLE for tracking purposes:)
+- Add binutils-add-z16-name.diff so that the now official name
+ z16 for arch14 is recognized. [bsc#1198237]
New:
----
arm32-avoid-copyreloc.patch
binutils-maxpagesize.diff
binutils-pr29482.diff
binutils-revert-rela.diff
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Other differences:
------------------
++++++ binutils.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.5LcVqY/_old 2023-01-23 18:30:23.735481355 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.5LcVqY/_new 2023-01-23 18:30:23.739481380 +0100
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
%define make_check_handling false
%endif
# handle all binary object formats supported by SUSE (and a few more)
-%ifarch %ix86 %arm aarch64 ia64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390 s390x x86_64
+%ifarch %ix86 %arm aarch64 ia64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390 s390x x86_64
%x86_64
%define build_multitarget 1
%else
%define build_multitarget 0
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@
Patch8: ld-relro.diff
Patch9: testsuite.diff
Patch10: enable-targets-gold.diff
+Patch11: arm32-avoid-copyreloc.patch
Patch12: s390-pic-dso.diff
Patch14: binutils-build-as-needed.diff
Patch15: binutils-znow.patch
@@ -138,6 +139,9 @@
Patch41: binutils-fix-relax.diff
Patch42: binutils-compat-old-behaviour.diff
Patch43: binutils-revert-hlasm-insns.diff
+Patch44: binutils-revert-rela.diff
+Patch45: binutils-pr29482.diff
+Patch46: binutils-maxpagesize.diff
Patch100: add-ulp-section.diff
Patch90: cross-avr-nesc-as.patch
Patch92: cross-avr-omit_section_dynsym.patch
@@ -165,7 +169,7 @@
PreReq: update-alternatives
%endif
%if 0%{!?cross:1} && 0%{?suse_version} >= 1310
-%define gold_archs %ix86 aarch64 %arm x86_64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le s390x %sparc
+%define gold_archs %ix86 aarch64 %arm x86_64 %x86_64 ppc ppc64 ppc64le s390x
%sparc
%endif
%description gold
@@ -215,7 +219,7 @@
%ifarch %arm
%define HOST %{_target_cpu}-suse-linux-gnueabi
%else
-%define HOST %(echo %{_target_cpu} | sed -e "s/parisc/hppa/" -e "s/i.86/i586/"
-e "s/ppc/powerpc/" -e "s/sparc64v.*/sparc64/" -e
"s/sparcv.*/sparc/")-suse-linux
+%define HOST %(echo %{_target_cpu} | sed -s -e "s/x86_64_v./x86_64/" -e
"s/parisc/hppa/" -e "s/i.86/i586/" -e "s/ppc/powerpc/" -e
"s/sparc64v.*/sparc64/" -e "s/sparcv.*/sparc/")-suse-linux
%endif
%define DIST %(echo '%distribution' | sed 's/ (.*)//')
@@ -243,6 +247,7 @@
%patch8
%patch9
%patch10
+%patch11 -p1
%patch12
%patch14
%patch15
@@ -259,7 +264,10 @@
%if %{suse_version} < 1550
%patch42 -p1
%patch43 -p1
+%patch44 -p1
%endif
+%patch45 -p1
+%patch46 -p1
%patch100 -p1
%if "%{TARGET}" == "avr"
cp gas/config/tc-avr.h gas/config/tc-avr-nesc.h
@@ -690,7 +698,7 @@
%{_libdir}/libctf-nobfd.so.*
%if %{suse_version} > 1500
-%ifarch %ix86 x86_64 aarch64
+%ifarch %ix86 x86_64 %x86_64 aarch64
%files -n gprofng
%defattr(-,root,root)
%dir %{_libdir}/gprofng/
++++++ arm32-avoid-copyreloc.patch ++++++
When a writable input section (i.e. data) refers to a symbol defined in an
ET_DYN object, BFD ld for ARM targets generates a COPY dynamic reloc. For
other targets like x86, this situation generates a plain data dynamic
reloc. Gold for ARM also generates the plain data dynamic reloc.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200962
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177
---
bfd/elf32-arm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: binutils-2.39/bfd/elf32-arm.c
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/bfd/elf32-arm.c
+++ binutils-2.39/bfd/elf32-arm.c
@@ -16196,6 +16196,21 @@ elf32_arm_adjust_dynamic_symbol (struct
if (bfd_link_pic (info) || globals->root.is_relocatable_executable)
return true;
+ /* If -z nocopyreloc was given, we won't generate them either. */
+ if (info->nocopyreloc)
+ {
+ h->non_got_ref = 0;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ /* If we don't find any dynamic relocs in read-only sections, then
+ we'll be keeping the dynamic relocs and avoiding the copy reloc. */
+ if (!_bfd_elf_readonly_dynrelocs (h))
+ {
+ h->non_got_ref = 0;
+ return true;
+ }
+
/* We must allocate the symbol in our .dynbss section, which will
become part of the .bss section of the executable. There will be
an entry for this symbol in the .dynsym section. The dynamic
@@ -16205,9 +16220,9 @@ elf32_arm_adjust_dynamic_symbol (struct
determine the address it must put in the global offset table, so
both the dynamic object and the regular object will refer to the
same memory location for the variable. */
- /* If allowed, we must generate a R_ARM_COPY reloc to tell the dynamic
- linker to copy the initial value out of the dynamic object and into
- the runtime process image. We need to remember the offset into the
+ /* We must generate a R_ARM_COPY reloc to tell the dynamic linker to
+ copy the initial value out of the dynamic object and into the
+ runtime process image. We need to remember the offset into the
.rel(a).bss section we are going to use. */
if ((h->root.u.def.section->flags & SEC_READONLY) != 0)
{
@@ -16219,9 +16234,7 @@ elf32_arm_adjust_dynamic_symbol (struct
s = globals->root.sdynbss;
srel = globals->root.srelbss;
}
- if (info->nocopyreloc == 0
- && (h->root.u.def.section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0
- && h->size != 0)
+ if ((h->root.u.def.section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0 && h->size != 0)
{
elf32_arm_allocate_dynrelocs (info, srel, 1);
h->needs_copy = 1;
++++++ binutils-maxpagesize.diff ++++++
commit a2267dbfc9e1dd955f78561c40f00afa9ddbe619
Author: Michael Matz <m...@suse.de>
Date: Thu Oct 20 16:06:57 2022 +0200
x86-64: Use only one default max-page-size
On x86-64 the default ELF_MAXPAGESIZE depends on a configure
option (--disable-separate-code). Since 9833b775
("PR28824, relro security issues") we use max-page-size for relro
alignment (with a short interval, from 31b4d3a ("PR28824, relro
security issues, x86 keep COMMONPAGESIZE relro") to its revert
a1faa5ea, where x86-64 only used COMMONPAGESIZE as relro alignment
target).
But that means that a linker configured with --disable-separate-code
behaves different from one configured with --enable-separate-code
(the default), _even if using "-z {no,}separate-code" option to use
the non-configured behaviour_ . In particular it means that when
configuring with --disable-separate-code the linker will produce
binaries aligned to 2MB pages on disk, and hence generate 2MB
executables for a hello world (and even 6MB when linked with
"-z separate-code").
Generally we can't have constants that ultimately land in static
variables be depending on configure options if those only influence
behaviour that is overridable by command line options.
So, do away with that, make the default MAXPAGESIZE be 4k (as is default
for most x86-64 configs anyway, as most people won't configure with
--disable-separate-code). If people need more they can use the
"-z max-page-size" (with would have been required right now for a
default configure binutils).
bfd/
* elf64-x86-64.c (ELF_MAXPAGESIZE): Don't depend on
DEFAULT_LD_Z_SEPARATE_CODE.
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
index f3b54400013..2ae8dffba0f 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
@@ -5259,11 +5259,7 @@ elf_x86_64_special_sections[]=
#define ELF_ARCH bfd_arch_i386
#define ELF_TARGET_ID X86_64_ELF_DATA
#define ELF_MACHINE_CODE EM_X86_64
-#if DEFAULT_LD_Z_SEPARATE_CODE
-# define ELF_MAXPAGESIZE 0x1000
-#else
-# define ELF_MAXPAGESIZE 0x200000
-#endif
+#define ELF_MAXPAGESIZE 0x1000
#define ELF_COMMONPAGESIZE 0x1000
#define elf_backend_can_gc_sections 1
++++++ binutils-pr29482.diff ++++++
PR29482 aka CVE-2022-38533
>From ef186fe54aa6d281a3ff8a9528417e5cc614c797 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 15:32:47 +0930
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] PR29482 - strip: heap-buffer-overflow
PR 29482
* coffcode.h (coff_set_section_contents): Sanity check _LIB.
---
bfd/coffcode.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: binutils-2.39/bfd/coffcode.h
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/bfd/coffcode.h 2022-07-08 11:46:47.000000000 +0200
+++ binutils-2.39/bfd/coffcode.h 2022-08-26 15:23:58.749610670 +0200
@@ -4284,10 +4284,13 @@ coff_set_section_contents (bfd * abfd,
rec = (bfd_byte *) location;
recend = rec + count;
- while (rec < recend)
+ while (recend - rec >= 4)
{
+ size_t len = bfd_get_32 (abfd, rec);
+ if (len == 0 || len > (size_t) (recend - rec) / 4)
+ break;
+ rec += len * 4;
++section->lma;
- rec += bfd_get_32 (abfd, rec) * 4;
}
BFD_ASSERT (rec == recend);
++++++ binutils-revert-rela.diff ++++++
This is for bsc#1198422
This essentially reverts commit 17c6c3b99156fe82c1e637e1a5fd9f163ac788c8
to return back to old behaviour regarding RELA relocs: old binutils
used the relocated field as additional addend, relying on it being
zero for normal RELA behaviour. This isn't correct according to the
psABI, but some old tools (e.g. older ICC) emit object files where
the in-field "addend" is to be used (and record the zero in the A field
of the RELA reloc). This change was included starting with binutils 2.37,
but for older codestreams we want to be compatible with the old (buggy)
behaviour. We revert the change for all relocs and not just those for
which it arguably made some sense or where we had a report about (PLT32).
Index: binutils-2.39/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c 2022-10-17 16:20:55.074224642
+0200
+++ binutils-2.39/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c 2022-10-17 16:31:36.128864508 +0200
@@ -47,127 +47,127 @@ static reloc_howto_type x86_64_elf_howto
bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_NONE", false, 0, 0x00000000,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PC32, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC32", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOT32, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOT32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOT32", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PLT32, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PLT32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PLT32", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_COPY, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_bitfield,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_COPY", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_COPY", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT", false, MINUS_ONE,
MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_RELATIVE, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_RELATIVE", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_RELATIVE", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPCREL, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPCREL", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPCREL", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_32, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_unsigned,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_32", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_32S, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_32S", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_32S", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_16, 0, 2, 16, false, 0, complain_overflow_bitfield,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_16", false, 0, 0xffff, false),
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_16", false, 0xffff, 0xffff, false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PC16, 0, 2, 16, true, 0, complain_overflow_bitfield,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC16", false, 0, 0xffff, true),
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC16", false, 0xffff, 0xffff, true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_8, 0, 1, 8, false, 0, complain_overflow_bitfield,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_8", false, 0, 0xff, false),
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_8", false, 0xff, 0xff, false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PC8, 0, 1, 8, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC8", false, 0, 0xff, true),
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC8", false, 0xff, 0xff, true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_DTPMOD64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_DTPMOD64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_DTPMOD64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_DTPOFF64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_DTPOFF64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_DTPOFF64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_TPOFF64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TPOFF64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TPOFF64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_TLSGD, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TLSGD", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TLSGD", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_TLSLD, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TLSLD", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TLSLD", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_DTPOFF32, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_DTPOFF32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_DTPOFF32", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_TPOFF32, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TPOFF32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_TPOFF32", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PC64, 0, 8, 64, true, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTOFF64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTOFF64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTOFF64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPC32, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPC32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPC32", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOT64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOT64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOT64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPCREL64, 0, 8, 64, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPCREL64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPCREL64", false, MINUS_ONE,
MINUS_ONE,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPC64, 0, 8, 64, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPC64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPC64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPLT64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPLT64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPLT64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PLTOFF64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PLTOFF64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PLTOFF64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_SIZE32, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_unsigned,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_SIZE32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_SIZE32", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_SIZE64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_SIZE64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_SIZE64", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC, 0, 4, 32, true, 0,
complain_overflow_bitfield, bfd_elf_generic_reloc,
- "R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC", false, 0, 0xffffffff, true),
+ "R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL, 0, 0, 0, false, 0,
complain_overflow_dont, bfd_elf_generic_reloc,
"R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL",
false, 0, 0, false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_TLSDESC, 0, 8, 64, false, 0,
complain_overflow_dont, bfd_elf_generic_reloc,
- "R_X86_64_TLSDESC", false, 0, MINUS_ONE, false),
+ "R_X86_64_TLSDESC", false, MINUS_ONE, MINUS_ONE, false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_IRELATIVE, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_IRELATIVE", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_IRELATIVE", false, MINUS_ONE,
MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_RELATIVE64, 0, 8, 64, false, 0, complain_overflow_dont,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_RELATIVE64", false, 0, MINUS_ONE,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_RELATIVE64", false, MINUS_ONE,
MINUS_ONE,
false),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PC32_BND, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC32_BND", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PC32_BND", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_PLT32_BND, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PLT32_BND", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_PLT32_BND", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
HOWTO(R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX, 0, 4, 32, true, 0, complain_overflow_signed,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX", false, 0xffffffff,
0xffffffff,
true),
/* We have a gap in the reloc numbers here.
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static reloc_howto_type x86_64_elf_howto
/* Use complain_overflow_bitfield on R_X86_64_32 for x32. */
HOWTO(R_X86_64_32, 0, 4, 32, false, 0, complain_overflow_bitfield,
- bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_32", false, 0, 0xffffffff,
+ bfd_elf_generic_reloc, "R_X86_64_32", false, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff,
false)
};
Index: binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp 2022-07-08
11:46:47.000000000 +0200
+++ binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp 2022-10-17
16:27:41.276966573 +0200
@@ -1287,7 +1287,6 @@ if [gas_64_check] then {
run_list_test "reloc64" "--defsym _bad_=1"
run_list_test "x86-64-inval-tls"
run_dump_test "mixed-mode-reloc64"
- run_dump_test "rela"
run_dump_test "x86-64-ifunc"
run_dump_test "x86-64-opcode-inval"
run_dump_test "x86-64-opcode-inval-intel"
Index: binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rela.d
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rela.d 2022-07-08
11:46:47.000000000 +0200
+++ /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-#name: x86-64 rela relocs w/ non-zero relocated fields
-#objdump: -rsj .data
-
-.*: +file format .*
-
-RELOCATION RECORDS FOR \[\.data\]:
-
-OFFSET +TYPE +VALUE
-0*0 R_X86_64_64 *q
-0*8 R_X86_64_32 *l
-
-Contents of section .data:
- 0+0 11 ?11 ?11 ?11 22 ?22 ?22 ?22 33 ?33 ?33 ?33 44 ?44 ?44 ?44 .*
Index: binutils-2.39/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rela.s
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rela.s 2022-07-08
11:46:47.000000000 +0200
+++ /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
-# Note: This file is also used by an ld test case.
-
- .text
- .global _start
-_start:
- ret
-
- .data
- .p2align 4
-l: .long 0x11111111, 0x22222222
-q: .quad 0x4444444433333333
-
- .reloc l, BFD_RELOC_64, q
- .reloc q, BFD_RELOC_32, l
Index: binutils-2.39/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/rela.d
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/rela.d 2022-07-08
11:46:48.000000000 +0200
+++ /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-#name: x86-64 rela relocs w/ non-zero relocated fields
-#as: --64
-#source: ${srcdir}/../../../gas/testsuite/gas/i386/rela.s
-#ld: -melf_x86_64
-#objdump: -sj .data
-
-.*: +file format .*
-
-Contents of section .data:
- *[0-9a-f]*0 .8 ?.. ?.. ?.. 00 ?00 ?00 ?00 .0 ?.. ?.. ?.. 44 ?44 ?44 ?44 .*
Index: binutils-2.39/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp
===================================================================
--- binutils-2.39.orig/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp 2022-07-26
09:13:10.000000000 +0200
+++ binutils-2.39/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp 2022-10-17
16:27:41.276966573 +0200
@@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ run_dump_test "apic"
run_dump_test "pcrel8"
run_dump_test "pcrel16"
run_dump_test "pcrel16-2"
-run_dump_test "rela"
run_dump_test "tlsgd2"
run_dump_test "tlsgd3"
run_dump_test "tlsgd12"
++++++ s390-pic-dso.diff ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.5LcVqY/_old 2023-01-23 18:30:23.959482738 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.5LcVqY/_new 2023-01-23 18:30:23.963482762 +0100
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
+ || ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (h->other) != STV_PROTECTED))
+ {
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
-+ (_("%B: relocation %s against `%s' can not be used when "
++ (_("%pB: relocation %s against `%s' can not be used when "
+ "making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC"),
+ input_bfd, elf_howto_table[r_type].name,
+ h->root.root.string);
